July 23, 2019

July 23, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 22, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Cloud Computing: Just Say No

This article is the third installment of an ongoing series analyzing various state approaches to the taxation of cloud computing services. This article examines recent developments in Idaho, New Jersey and Vermont.  Idaho has taken the all-important step of addressing the taxation of cloud computing services through legislation.  While the new statutory provisions are not airtight, they provide a good source of guidance to taxpayers and the state revenue department that most states have not provided.  Unlike the previously analyzed approaches of the Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania and Utah revenue departments, the New Jersey Division of taxation has administratively determined that fees paid for those services are not subject to sales and use taxes.  In New Jersey, control of property must be transferred in order for a transaction to be taxable and the Division recognizes that the provision of cloud computing services does not effectuate a taxable transfer of control.  Finally, Vermont legislators have allowed the state’s moratorium on the taxation of cloud computing services to expire, opening the door for the Vermont Department of Revenue to make an administrative determination regarding their taxability.  Under Vermont law, like New Jersey and the other states, a transfer of control of property is needed in order for a transaction to be taxable; however, all signs indicate that Vermont will follow the approach of Massachusetts and attempt to subject cloud computing services to tax despite the lack of a taxable transfer of control.  This article was published in the August 5, 2013 issue of State Tax Notes; the two prior articles in this series, Cloud Computing: The Answer is 'No' (October 8, 2012) and Cloud Computing: The Answer is Still ‘No’ (February 25, 2013), were also published inState Tax Notes.

Read the full article here

© 2019 McDermott Will & Emery

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Arthur R. Rosen, Tax Planning Litigator, McDermott Will Emery, New York Law Firm
Partner

Arthur R. Rosen is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s New York office. His practice focuses on tax planning and litigation relating to state and local tax matters for corporations, partnerships and individuals. Formerly the Deputy Counsel of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, as well as Counsel to the Governor’s Temporary Sales Tax Commission and Tax Counsel to the New York State Senate Tax Committee, Mr. Rosen has held executive tax management positions at Xerox Corporation and AT&T....

212-547-5596