February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 20, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 19, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

CMS Proposes New Medicare Telehealth Coding Rules

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) for CY 2017 on July 7, 2016. In it, CMS would require practitioners to use a new place of service (POS) code to report telehealth services. The proposed rule also includes several new covered telehealth services. If enacted, the proposed rules are effective January 1, 2017.

New Place of Service Code for Medicare Telehealth Services

Xray, TelehealthCurrently, CMS instructs practitioners billing telehealth services to report the POS code that would have been reported had the service been furnished in-person where the beneficiary is located. This rule has generated confusion because some practitioners incorrectly report the POS where they, themselves, are located when the service is furnished. Under the proposed rule, practitioners would report a new “telehealth” POS code to indicate the service was telehealth service furnished from a distant site. 

The telehealth POS code would not apply to originating sites billing the facility fee. CMS’ reasoned that originating sites are not furnishing a telehealth service as the patient is physically present at the originating site. Accordingly, the originating site would continue to use the POS code that applies to the type of facility where the patient is located.

New Reimbursement Rate Calculations for Medicare Telehealth Services

With regard to payment rates for telehealth services under the new POS code, CMS would use the practice expense relative value units (PE RVUs) to pay for telehealth services tagged with the code. There are only three codes on the telehealth services list with a difference greater than 1.0 PE RVUs between the facility PE RVUs and the non-facility PE RVUs. Other than those three codes, payment rates for telehealth services should remain unaffected by the proposed rule. As such, CMS does not anticipate this rule change to significantly change the overall payments for the telehealth services under Medicare. Rather, CMS believes use of this new telehealth POS code will improve payment accuracy and consistency in claims submission.

New Telehealth Services Under Medicare

CMS proposed adding eight codes to the list of covered telehealth services. These are:

  • End-stage renal disease (ESRD) related services for dialysis (90967, 90968, 90969 and 90970);

  • Advance care planning services (99497 and 99498); and

  • Critical care consultations furnished via telehealth using new Medicare G-codes (GTTT1 and GTTT2).

CMS declined to add codes related to observation care, emergency department visits, psychological testing, physical and occupational therapy, and speech language pathology. While the proposed rule expands the scope of covered telehealth services by adding eight new codes, coverage by Medicare for telehealth services continues to be subject to the same five statutory conditions for coverage.

Make Your Voice Heard

Interested telemedicine companies and health care providers should review the proposed rule and consider submitting comments to make your voice heard regarding these new changes. Comments can be in support of the proposed rule or suggest changes, but all comments are due by September 6, 2016. Anyone may submit a comment, and may do so anonymously. Submit comments online here. Alternatively, submit comments by mail to:

  • Regular Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS–1654–P, P.O. Box 8013, Baltimore, MD 21244–8013

  • Express or Overnight Mail: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS–1654–P, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850

© 2019 Foley & Lardner LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Nathaniel Lacktman, Health Care Attorney, Foley and Lardner Law Firm
Partner

Nathaniel (Nate) Lacktman is a partner and health care lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP, and a Certified Compliance & Ethics Professional (CCEP). His practice focuses on health care compliance, counseling, enforcement and litigation, as well as telemedicine and telehealth. Mr. Lacktman is a member of the firm’s Health Care Industry Team which was named “Law Firm of the Year — Health Care Law” for three of the past four years on the U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” list. 

813-225-4127
Thomas B. Ferrante, Foley, Healthcare Regulatory Lawyer, Transactional Matters Attorney
Senior Counsel

Thomas (T.J.) Ferrante is an associate and health care lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP, where he focuses his practice on a wide range of transactional and related regulatory issues for health industry clients, including for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals and health systems, multi-specialty physician practice groups, and long-term care providers. Mr. Ferrante has experience with a variety of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic affiliations, obtaining and maintaining tax-exemption, employment contracts and leases, and other transactional matters.

Mr. Ferrante also advises health care clients in all aspects of federal and state regulatory matters, including anti-kickback, self-referral laws, state licensure, fee splitting, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and compliance, and federal laws related to clinical trials. He has represented clients investigated by various federal and state agencies, including the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, and the Florida Board of Medicine.

813-225-4148