July 4, 2022

Volume XII, Number 185

Advertisement
Advertisement

July 01, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

EEOC Provides New Guidance on COVID-19 Pandemic and Caregiver Discrimination

On March 14, 2022, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued a technical assistance document providing guidance when it comes to claims of discrimination against employees and applicants with caregiving responsibilities in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic (“Guidelines”).  The Guidelines, entitled “The COVID-19 Pandemic and Caregiver Discrimination Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws”, examine discrimination against employees and applicants based on pandemic caregiving responsibilities, noting that such discrimination may violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) or Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), or other federal laws.

The Guidelines explicitly state that Federal employment discrimination laws do not prohibit employment discrimination based solely on caregiver status.  However, caregiver discrimination may violate federal law when it is based on an employee’s or applicant’s protected characteristics including, but not limited to, race or sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity).  Caregiver discrimination also is unlawful if it is “based on an applicant’s or employee’s association with an individual with a disability, within the meaning of the ADA, or on the race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristic of the individual for whom care is provided.”

The Guidelines provide multiple instances of unlawful conduct by employers in connection with pandemic-related caregiving responsibilities.

Example 1: It would be unlawful if an employer refused to promote or hire a female employee or applicant based on the assumption that she would “focus primarily on caring for her young children while they attend school remotely, or on caring for her parents or other adult relatives.”

Example 2: It would be unlawful if an employer declined to assign a female caregiver “demanding or high-profile projects that increase [that employee’s] advancement potential but require overtime or travel,” based on the employer’s assumptions that these actions would enable the employee to better balance work and personal life (if a family member is infected with or exposed to COVID-19).

Example 3: It would be unlawful if an employer denied a male caregiver leave to care for a family member with COVID-19 or manage other pandemic-related caregiving duties “if the employer grants such requests when made by similarly situated women.”

Example 4: It would be unlawful for an employer to impose more burdensome procedures on LGBTQI+ employees who “make caregiver-related requests, such as requiring proof of a marital or other family relationship with the individual needing care, if such requirements are not imposed on other employees who make such requests.”

Example 5: It would be unlawful if an employer refused to promote or demoted pregnant employees, based on assumptions that such employees would be “primarily focused on ensuring safe and healthy pregnancies.”

There are many other examples of unlawful conduct identified in the Guidelines, which include other instances of discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation.  Employers should consistently check the EEOC’s updates on pandemic-related guidance and determine how they could affect company practices.

Copyright © 2022, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 83
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Holly H. Williamson Partner Houston  Energy Retail and Consumer Products
Partner

Holly represents management in labor and employment law litigation, contract negotiations, drug testing and arbitrations.

Holly represents clients before administrative agencies, such as the Department of Labor,  the Department of Justice, the EEOC, the Texas Commissions on Human Rights and the Texas Workforce Commission.

She serves as primary regional employment counsel to companies in the oil and gas exploration and production, oil and gas tools and service, restaurant, retail, financial, chemical, health care, drug testing and administration, transportation, and...

713-229-5717
Michael A. Pearlson Labor and Employment Attorney Hunton Andrews Kurth Los Angeles
Associate

Michael is an associate in the Labor and Employment group, focusing his practice on complex discrimination, harassment, and wage and hour disputes, including class actions and PAGA matters.

Michael’s experience includes wage and hour class actions; California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) suits; and workplace discrimination, harassment, and retaliation matters.

213-532-2012
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement