October 21, 2020

Volume X, Number 295

Advertisement

October 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 20, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 19, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FDIC Follows OCC Lead in Attempt to Clarify Madden Uncertainty

On June 25, 2020, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued a final rule that attempts to resolve the legal uncertainty created by the 2015 holding of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015). The FDIC’s Final Rule follows the May 29, 2020, issuance of a similar rule by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

Madden held that a non-bank purchaser of charged-off debt from a national bank seller could not inherit the preemptive interest rate authority enjoyed by national banks under Section 85 of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 85. In reaching its holding, the Second Circuit reasoned that, rather than significantly interfering with a national bank’s exercise of its powers, the application of state usury laws to the third-party assignee “would limit[ ] only activities of [a] third party which are otherwise subject to state control … and which are not protected by federal banking law or subject to OCC oversight.”  Thus, the decision in Madden called into question the enforceability of the interest rate terms of loan agreements following a national bank's assignment of one or more loans to a non-bank assignee.

The OCC’s Final Rule sought to resolve the legal uncertainty resulting from Madden by clarifying that when a “[national] bank transfers a loan, [the] interest permissible before the transfer continues to be permissible after the transfer.” Pursuant to the OCC’s Final Rule, national banks and saving associations may transfer their loans without impacting the permissibility or enforceability of the interest term.

In its analysis accompanying the OCC’s Final Rule, the OCC stated that its interpretation relies on the “cardinal rules in the doctrine of usury” that establish the broad proposition that “[t]he usurious or non-usurious character of a contract endures through assignment.” The OCC also noted that its interpretation is supported by “national banks’ ability to assign contracts and operate lending programs on a nationwide basis” consistent with the purposes of Section 85. Additionally, because national banks continue to rely on loan transfers to access alternative funding sources and to manage certain operational risks, the OCC believes that its interpretation also promotes safety and soundness, which is a core component of the OCC’s mission as the prudential regulator of national banks.

The FDIC’s Final Rule provides that the interest rate for a loan is determined when the loan is made and will not be affected by subsequent events such as changes in state law or a subsequent sale, assignment, or other transfer of the loan. The rule is applicable to state-chartered banks and insured branches of foreign banks. Consistent with its initially proposed rule, the FDIC’s Final Rule “does not purport to allow State Banks to assign the ability to preempt State law interest rate limits” under federal law. Rather, its final rule merely allows State Banks “to assign loans at their contractual interest rates…”

Both the FDIC and OCC specifically chose not to address “which entity is the true lender when a bank transfers a loan to a third party.” In adopting its final rule, the OCC declined to include a regulatory text providing that the final rule does not affect the determination of which entity is the true lender. Additionally, because the final rule only applies to bank loans that are permissible under Sections 85 or 1463(g), the OCC also declined to include a provision that the final rule only applies when the bank is the true lender.

The OCC’s Final Rule is effective August 3, 2020. The FDIC’s Final Rule will be effective thirty days from the date of publication of its final rule in the Federal Register.

©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume X, Number 189
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Carl Fornaris, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Miami and Washington DC, Finance and Corporate Law Attorney
Shareholder

Carl A. Fornaris is an attorney in firm's Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice. With 24 years of legal experience, Carl advises banks and their holding companies, investment advisers, securities broker dealers, gaming firms, money services businesses and other financial institutions on all aspects of their business. These include  licensing, capital-raising transactions, acquisitions and divestitures, USA PATRIOT Act/BSA/AML compliance and OFAC sanctions programs (including permissible financial activities in Cuba), critical examination reports and enforcement...

305-579-0626
Gil Rudolph, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Washington DC, Phoenix, Finance Law Attorney
Shareholder

Gil Rudolph is Co-Chair of the firm's Financial Regulatory and Compliance Practice. Gil focuses his practice on the representation of finance companies, banks, mortgage originators and servicers, education lenders, title insurance companies and other consumer financial service providers in regulatory and litigation matters.

Gil also represents various alternative financial service providers, including small dollar/short term lenders, check cashers, pawn and auto title lenders. He additionally represents various participants in the credit, debit, and prepaid card issuance and processing industries.

Areas of Concentration:

  • Federal and state regulation of consumer credit and other financial services
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
  • Residential mortgage lending and servicing
  • Small dollar, short term lenders
  • Education finance
602-445-8206
Jennifer D. Newton Practice Group Attorney Corporate, Financial Regulatory & Compliance, Banking & Financial Services
Practice Group Attorney

Jennifer D. Newton, a former federal financial services regulator, advises banking and financial institutions on risk management and compliance matters relating to federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations. Additionally, Jennifer works with a variety of clients on privacy and financial technology (fintech) matters involving data security, data breach, open banking, and payment system issues under the Global Data Privacy Regulation (GDPR), the Electronic Funds Transfer Act (EFTA), and federal and state privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA),...

305-579-0584
Advertisement
Advertisement