September 28, 2020

Volume X, Number 272

September 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Federal Communications Commission: One Less Privacy Regulator?

On March 1, 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) stayed the data security regulations from its 2016 Broadband Privacy Order, which would have required broadband Internet access service providers to “take reasonable measures to protect customer [proprietary information] from unauthorized use, disclosures, or access.” The Privacy Order would have allowed the FCC to look beyond the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) interpretation of “reasonable measures” with respect to the privacy practices of broadband Internet access service providers and take into account other privacy regimes such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and the Gramm Leach Bliley Act. The FCC found that the petitioners who requested the stay were “uniquely likely to succeed on their claim … that this requirement sweeps too broadly and too vaguely, ‘substantially widening the uncertainty and compliance burdens imposed upon ISPs relative to all other Internet entities and heightening the risks of different interpretations.’”

That same day, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and Acting FTC Chairman Maureen Ohlhausen issued a joint statement criticizing the FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order, which effectively stripped the FTC of its authority over broadband Internet service providers by reclassifying broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service. In their joint statement, the chairmen departed from the Open Internet Order’s removal of “an effective cop from the beat” and stated, “We still believe that jurisdiction over broadband providers’ privacy and data security practices should be returned to the FTC, the nation’s expert agency with respect to these important subjects. All actors in the online space should be subject to the same rules, enforced by the same agency.” It seems that the FCC is stepping back from privacy and security regulation in favor of the FTC, and businesses and consumers will have to wait to see how the two agencies “work together” to fill the gap.  

©2020 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 66

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Michelle L. Dama, Attorney, Litigation, Michael Best Law Firm
Partner

Corporate clients turn to Michelle for her experience litigating commercial and intellectual property disputes, among other matters. Michelle also serves as a member of the firm’s Class Action/Multidistrict Litigation team. She tries cases in both federal and state courts at  the trial and appellate levels.

Michelle assists a diverse group of clients, many of them long-standing, in the following areas:

  • Complex commercial disputes
  • Intellectual property and trademark litigation
  • Product liability actions
  • Consumer law,...
608-283-0118
Adrienne Ehrhardt, Michael Best Law Firm, Corporate and Transactional Attorney
Partner

Known for giving practical and actionable legal advice, Adrienne counsels clients on the many complex aspects of privacy and data management matters.

Her extensive background includes experience with issues relating to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), as well as privacy programs and cyber security issues.

Prior to joining Michael Best, Adrienne served as the in-house lead attorney in privacy and data protection at CUNA Mutual Group. She also served as Associate General Counsel at Land’s End, Inc., where she managed litigation, counseled the company on internal legal matters and negotiated and drafted a variety of transactional agreements. Previously, she was a member of the commercial litigation practices of two international business law firms, and began her career as a Judicial Law Clerk in United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

608-283-0131