January 31, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 31


January 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FinCEN Notice Launches Regulatory Process Requiring Covered Domestic and Foreign Companies to Report Beneficial Ownership to U.S. Government

Today the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“FinCEN”) published in the Federal Register a notice framing and seeking comment on key questions about how it will implement the new law requiring domestic and foreign legal entities to report their beneficial ownership to the U.S. government.  FinCEN’s action today is important because it launches the administrative rulemaking process that will dictate many of the critical details of the upcoming regulatory regime whereby most companies and investment vehicles will be required to report beneficial ownership.  Following on FinCEN’s rule requiring certain financial institutions to collect beneficial ownership information from legal entity customers, its new rulemaking beginning with the Federal Register notice published today will further curtail the ability to use U.S. limited liability companies, statutory trusts, and corporations to conceal asset ownership and to conduct economic and financial activity anonymously.


After years of criticism from other nations, pressure from the international Financial Action Task Force, and debate on Capitol Hill to address the United States’ vulnerabilities in the realm of anti-money laundering, the financing of terrorism, and illicit activities conducted through shell companies, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) as part of the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act.  The CTA requires FinCEN to promulgate regulations requiring beneficial ownership disclosures for small corporations, limited liability companies (“LLCs”) and other partnerships.  Today’s advance notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPRM”) and solicits comments on two of the CTA’s major beneficial ownership provisions within CTA.  The comment period closes May 5, 2021.[1]

FinCEN is seeking comment on the following two items:

  • standards and procedures for requiring reporting companies to submit information to FinCEN, and

  • implementation of FinCEN’s protocols for maintaining and disclosing beneficial ownership information.

FinCEN Requests for Comment


The CTA defines the categories of entities required to disclose the beneficial ownership information broadly.  FinCEN seeks on potential ambiguities, uncertainties, and coverage gaps in the definitions.

Reporting of Beneficial Ownership Information

As currently written in statute, a “beneficial owner” is an individual who either directly or indirectly: (i) exercises “substantial control” over the entity; or (ii) owns or controls not less than 25 percent of ownership interests of said entity.  FinCEN seeks comment on the scope of reporting on an entity’s affiliates and/or subsidiaries, the nature of the relationship between each beneficial owner and the applicable reporting company, electronic filling or alternative filing mechanisms, burdens on filers, timelines for updating required beneficial ownership information, the scope of certain safe harbor provisions, and requirements for certifying of accuracy of beneficial ownership information submitted.

FinCEN Identifier

As part of the beneficial ownership filing, a reporting company must submit the following to FinCEN identifying each beneficial owner: (i) full legal name; (ii) date of birth; (iii) current residential or business address; and (iv) a unique identifier such as a driver’s license, passport or FinCEN identification number.  FinCEN is soliciting comments relative to identifying when filers must or may obtain a FinCEN identification number, how best to ensure FinCEN identification numbers relate to a single person or entity, protections and protocols regulating the use of the identifiers, and the processes for obtaining and issuing them.

Security and Use of Beneficial Ownership and Applicant Information

The CTA restricts disclosure of beneficial ownership information by FinCEN and outlines protocols for permissible disclosure to entities such as state, local or Tribal law enforcement authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction, a federal agency engaged in a matter on behalf of a law enforcement or court of another country, and/or a federal regulator or regulatory agency.  FinCEN may also disclose beneficial ownership information if authorized by the reporting company for due diligence requirements.  FinCEN seeks comment on procedures for authorizing and authenticating beneficial ownership information requests, the interpretation of terms such as “competent jurisdiction,” the availability of updated beneficial ownership information for Customer Due Diligence (“CDD”), and access to information about applications to obtain beneficial ownership information.

Cost, Process, Outreach and Partnership

FinCEN solicits comments on how best to address the cost and time burden placed on small businesses and state, local and Tribal governmental agencies by these provisions.  It requests suggestions about potential reporting alternatives and procedures to ensure efficient and effective filing.

Next Steps

The deadline to submit comment to FinCEN relative to the CTA is May 5, 2021.  Following the May deadline, FinCEN will be required to promulgate final reporting requirements relative to beneficial ownership information and disclosure protocols by January 1, 2022.  If you or your company would like to submit or participate in industry comments on any aspects of the new regime FinCEN is implementing or have any questions regarding the FinCEN rulemaking and CTA provisions summarized above, please reach out to your team at Mintz as soon as possible.

[1] 86 FR 17557.

©1994-2023 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 95

About this Author

Steve Ganis, Mintz Levin, Derivatives Litigation Attorney, AML Sanctions Lawyer

Steve has over 15 years of experience as a government and private-sector lawyer practicing financial services law, specializing in the federal banking, securities, and derivatives laws. He is globally recognized for his knowledge of anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions regulations.

He handles a wide range of matters for institutions and high-level financial services executives involving regulation of clearing and introducing broker-dealers, mutual funds, hedge funds, transfer agents, private equity funds, institutional investors, banks,...

William F Weld Attorney Mintz Levin Law Firm and Former Massachusetts Governor
Member Mintz ML Strategies - Principal

Former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld provides clients with advice and counsel related to domestic and international government strategies, international business transactions, cross-border investments, and international capital flows.

Before joining Mintz Levin and ML Strategies, Bill practiced law in the New York and Washington, DC offices of a large international law firm, where he established an extensive international consulting business in mining, energy, and technology.

Bill was elected Governor of Massachusetts in 1990 and reelected in 1994 with 71% of the vote....

Taylor C. Shepherd Government Relations Attorney Mintz Law Firm
Manager of Government Relations

Prior to joining ML Strategies, Taylor worked as a Budget Analyst at the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health.  At the Department, she worked closely with the Chief Financial Officer and Budget Director to develop reporting mechanisms to project payroll, monitor operational spending and facilitate Western, Central and Northeastern Massachusetts regional areas in their spending and personnel ventures. 

Previously, Taylor worked as a Legislative Aide and then as a Fiscal Policy Analyst for the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee at the Massachusetts State House.  Under...