May 14, 2021

Volume XI, Number 134

Advertisement

May 13, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 12, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 11, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Health Care Consolidation Legislation (AB 1132) No Longer Under Consideration in California Assembly

The California state legislature recently introduced – and then quickly pulled – new legislation that would have required Attorney General notice and consent for a potentially broad range of health care transactions and also prohibited certain managed care contracting practices. 

AB 1132 – the Health Care Consolidation and Contracting Fairness Act of 2021 was first introduced in the California Assembly on February 18, 2021. Initially the bill would have required Attorney General approval for certain types of health-related transactions and other arrangements that are valued at $3 million or more as well as certain other arrangements involving health care service plans or health insurers. The bill was amended in March of 2021 and, as amended, would have required Attorney General approval where a medical group, hospital, health plan, insurer, or pharmacy benefit manager entered into a transaction valued at over $5 million to either sell or transfer control over a material amount of its assets or operations. In addition, the amended bill would have included the following provisions:

  • Ambulatory surgical centers not owned by or affiliated with a general acute care facility would have been exempt from the notice and consent requirements;

  • Notice to the Attorney General would need to be provided 90 days in advance and the Attorney General would have 90 days to make a decision (which period the Attorney General would be able to extend by another 45 days under certain conditions). Before issuing a decision, the Attorney General would need to hold a public hearing;

  • The Attorney General’s approval could be based on factors such as whether or not the proposed material change would have a significant impact on market competition or costs, whether it would improve quality of care or access, and whether the change was in the public interest;

  • The Attorney General would have the ability to recoup from the entities seeking consent any costs incurred in reviewing and making a determination on the transaction, as well as costs incurred in engaging an expert to assist with monitoring ongoing compliance; and

  • In addition to the Attorney general notice and consent provisions, the bill would have prohibited health facilities from entering into any contract with a health plan or insurer that restricts the plan or insurer from directing or steering enrollees to other providers or facilities.

On April 12, 2021, however, the bill was amended to remove all of the above provisions related to health care consolidation and contracting, which may be a welcome development for providers considering a transaction in the near future. The amended bill now focuses on care coordination for Medicare/Medi-Cal dual eligible beneficiaries. Specifically, the bill requires dual eligible to be assigned to Medi-Cal managed care health plans in Coordinated Care Initiative counties.  The Coordinated Care Initiative is a demonstration project which enables dual eligibles to receive a continuum of services that maximize access to, and coordination of, benefits between the Medicare and Medi-Cal programs.

It is unclear why the health care consolidation and contracting provisions of the bill were removed. We understand anecdotally that legislative committee meeting times remain somewhat limited due to COVID-19 and that some controversial or difficult measures are being set aside for now due to limited committee time to work out the issues. Health care facilities and providers may recall that last year the California Senate debated a bill (SB-977) that would have imposed notice and approval requirements on health care systems, private equity groups, and hedge funds seeking to acquire or affiliate with a health care facility or provider (please click here and here for our previous alerts on SB-977).  That bill ultimately did not pass in the 2020 legislative session even though it had strong support from the Attorney General, organized labor, and a broad legislative coalition. Health care provider and payor stakeholders should continue to monitor the California legislative landscape and be prepared for the possibility of these proposed measures to resurface again.

Advertisement
© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 110
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jonathan F. Buck Healthcare Attorney Polsinelli Law Firm Los Angeles
Principle

Jonathan Buck provides strategic legal, compliance and operational guidance and support to a wide range of health care clients. Jonathan’s practice focuses on advising clients on health care regulation, Managed Care relationships and contract terms, assessment of claims or contract disputes, revenue cycle operations and general business strategies, including identifying operational improvements designed to support provider obligations, comply with applicable law, or to mitigate the impact of commercial payer tactics and claims adjudication practices. He is skilled in...

310.203.5369
Paul Gomez, Polsinelli Law Firm, Los Angeles, Healthcare Law Attorney
Principal

Paul Gomez brings a deep understanding of the major forces driving many healthcare transactions, including shifting payment models, advances in healthcare technology, and the need to achieve greater economies of scale. He combines that understanding with his knowledge of key health care legal requirements that impact the structure of healthcare deals and contracts to help clients attain their goals in a practical and efficient manner.

Paul's health care transactional and regulatory practice is centered around: 

  • Complex hospital/...
310-556-6762
Rick Rifenbark Health Care Attorney Polsinelli Los Angeles, CA
Principal

Richard (Rick) Rifenbark’s practice is a blend of health care regulatory compliance and transactions. He relies on his knowledge and experience to help clients identify, avoid, and (when necessary) resolve difficult regulatory compliance issues. He regularly advises clients on health care fraud and abuse laws and other regulatory issues, including the federal anti-kickback statute, stark physician self-referral law, false claims act, state licensing issues, corporate practice of medicine doctrines, and state fraud and abuse laws. Rick also negotiates and drafts transactional agreements,...

310-203-5321
Associate

Shuchi Parikh draws upon her prior experience working in-house and in private practice to advise clients on a range of health law matters. She assists providers with structuring complex transactions and developing strategic affiliations. She also provides regulatory compliance advice related to obligations under government health care programs.

Shuchi has been passionate about the health care industry since a young age. In today’s ever-changing health care landscape, she recognizes the importance of understanding the challenges that clients face. Shuchi’s experience includes...

310-203-5358
Advertisement
Advertisement