May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142


May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Hitting 500 – Aggregation of Employees Under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

On March 18, 2020, President Trump signed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (the “Act”), requiring employers with less than 500 employees to provide Public Health Emergency Leave and Paid Sick Time to employees impacted by the Coronavirus pandemic. The details of the Act are set out in our earlier Blog post here.

Act was passed, there has been much discussion about how employees across related companies should be counted for purposes of coverage. Today, the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor provided guidance to answer those questions, which can be found here.  In evaluating this issue, it is important to note that the two leave requirements arise in different portions of the Act. The right to Public Health Emergency Leave (“Paid FMLA Leave”) is set forth in Division C of the Act, which amends the existing statutory text of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). The right to Paid Sick Time is set forth in Division E of the Act, which creates a new statute known as the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act (“Paid Sick Leave”).

While both of these Divisions of the Act set the threshold for covered employers at “less than 500 employees,” neither provides express direction on how this number should be calculated across related entities. Today’s guidance resolves this issue.  Since Paid FMLA Leave is incorporated into the FMLA, it is governed by existing regulations addressing the issue, which provide for aggregation where an employer meets either the “Integrated Employer” and/or “Joint Employer” tests. Calculations for the Paid Sick Leave threshold, however, are subject only to the “Joint Employer” test.  Consequently, an employer could qualify as an integrated employer and be exempt from Paid FMLA Leave compliance under the FMLA, but not as an “joint employer” and therefore still subject to Paid Sick Leave compliance.

As a general matter, the legal entity which employs the employee is the “employer.” Where one corporation has an ownership interest in another corporation, it is a separate employer unless it is an “Integrated Employer” or a “Joint Employer.”[i]

To determine whether separate entities are considered an “Integrated Employer” for purposes of the FMLA, the Department of Labor considers “the entire relationship” between the parties “reviewed in its totality” based on the following four factors:

(i) Whether there is common management;

(ii) Whether the entities’ operations are interrelated;

(iii) Whether there is centralized control of labor relations; and

(iv) The degree of common ownership/financial control of the entities.

If the factors indicate the entities are an Integrated Employer, the employees of all entities making up the Integrated Employer are counted to determine employer coverage and eligibility under the FMLA.[ii]

Even if separate entities are not considered an Integrated Employer, the Department of Labor may consider separate entities a “Joint Employer” if the entities each or all exercise some control over the work or working conditions of an employee. Notably, the joint employer test does not require common ownership. Joint employers may be separate and distinct entities with separate owners, managers, and facilities. Nevertheless, if an employee performs work that simultaneously benefits two or more employers, or works for two or more employers at different times during the workweek, the separate entities will generally be considered a Joint Employer.

To evaluate whether an employee’s work simultaneously benefits two employers, the DOL applies a four-factor balancing test assessing whether the potential joint employer:

                (i) hires or fires the employee;

(ii) supervises and controls the employee’s work schedule or conditions of employment
to a substantial degree;

                (iii) determines the employee’s rate and method of payment; and

                (iv) maintains the employee’s employment records.

The potential joint employer must actually exercise—directly or indirectly—one or more of these indicia of control to be jointly liable under the Act; however the potential joint employer’s maintenance of the employee’s employment records alone will not lead to a finding of joint employer status.  DOL guidance on the Joint Employer test can be found here.

If two entities are found to be joint employers, all of their common employees must be counted in determining whether Paid Sick Leave and Paid FMLA Leave obligations apply.

Employers should exercise caution in oversimplifying the Integrated Employer and Joint Employer analyses to avoid coverage under the Act. An employer who takes the position that they are an Integrated Employer or Joint Employer for purposes of avoiding coverage under the Act may later find they waived their ability to assert they are separate entities in litigation or other disputes. Employers are encouraged to consult with counsel to determine coverage under the Act.

[i] 29 CFR 825.104(c)(1).
[ii] 29 CFR 825.104 (c)(2).

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 83

About this Author

Scott M. Gilbert, Polsinelli, Restrictive Covenants Attorney, defensive perspectives lawyer

Scott Gilbert counsels his clients during critical moments of the employment relationship. Whether clients need to create a strategy related to a reduction in force, or understand the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Scott helps clients identify and evaluate risk factors in order to minimize liability.  Scott regularly advises clients on matters related to restrictive covenants from both the enforcement and defensive perspectives.  He also advises clients in all facets of employment litigation, from discrimination claims before the Illinois Department...

Lilian Doan Davis, Polsinelli PC, Public Corporation Liabilities Lawyer, Whistleblower Claims Attorney

Lilian Davis helps private and public corporations, individuals, and municipalities identify and address potential liabilities. She brings a passion for the practice of employment law and a genuine interest in developing a strong relationship with her clients while gaining a thorough understanding of their business. Lilian understands the ongoing issues facing employers from a variety of perspectives. She counsels clients on management, compliance, and regulatory issues and investigates and responds to charges of employment discrimination. Her practice includes...