July 20, 2018

July 20, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 19, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 18, 2018

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Judge Reins in Intrusive Social Media Discovery in Discrimination Case

In a sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit pending in Connecticut federal court, Judge Merriam issued a decision denying the employer’s motion to compel broad discovery concerning the plaintiff’s social media.  The decision is consistent with a recent and long overdue trend that restricts intrusive and irrelevant social media discovery.

Lauren Marsteller alleges that defendants sexually harassed her, watched her changing her clothes on a company security camera, showed the video of her changing clothes to other employees, and retaliated against her.  She sued for harassment, retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress.  In discovery, defendants requested that Marstellar provide direct access to her social media accounts, or copies of her social media communications. Marsteller objected, and defendants moved to compel.

Judge Merriam denied the motion to compel: “Requiring plaintiff to provide her social media passwords to defendants would constitute a wholesale invasion of her privacy, and would be far outside the bounds of proportionality. One can hardly imagine a better example of a fishing expedition.”

Before consenting to broad social media discovery, plaintiffs should consider whether less intrusive discovery may be more probative.  Producing all social media posts to an adverse party discloses a wide range of personal matters that are wholly irrelevant to the claims.  Even worse, providing all social media posts may let the adverse party use discovery to harass the plaintiff and dissuade her from pursuing valid claims.

© 2018 Zuckerman Law

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Jason Zuckerman, Whistleblower Litigation Attorney, Washington DC  Law Firm
Principal

Jason Zuckerman is Principal of Zuckerman Law and litigates whistleblower retaliation, wrongful discharge, non-compete, and other employment-related claims.  Zuckerman serves as Plaintiff Co-Chair of the Whistleblower Subcommittee of the ABA Labor and Employment Section’s Employee Rights and Responsibilities Committee, and in 2012, the Secretary of Labor appointed Zuckerman to serve on the Whistleblower Protection Advisory Committee. 

Prior to founding Zuckerman Law, Zuckerman served as Senior Legal Advisor to the Special Counsel at the U.S...

(202) 262-8959