September 27, 2022

Volume XII, Number 270

Advertisement

September 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Lack of Presidential Appointment May Invalidate ALJ Decisions

In one of its last opinions of the term, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Lucia v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 21, 2018, that administrative law judges (ALJs) are officers of the United States, not mere employees, and therefore must be appointed under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. The decision leaves important questions open for individuals that have faced or are currently facing administrative proceedings before the SEC and other government agencies.

The Constitution’s Appointments Clause requires that “inferior officers” be appointed to their positions by the President, the courts or the Heads of Departments, or agency commissioners. The case at hand, Lucia v. SEC, concerned an administrative proceeding by the SEC against investment broker Raymond Lucia, whom the SEC accused of using misleading marketing practices to deceive prospective clients.

Mr. Lucia appealed the decision of the administrative law judge, who had fined him $300,000 and barred him for life from the investment industry, on the grounds that the presiding judge had been unconstitutionally appointed. The judge that heard Mr. Lucia’s case, along with the four other ALJs at the SEC, was not appointed by Commissioners, but by staff. Shortly after the case was filed, the SEC sought to remedy any potential constitutional violation by having the Commissioners simply appoint the five ALJs. The Court overturned the ruling against Mr. Lucia after the majority concluded that administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States. The Court went on to hold that Mr. Lucia was entitled to have his case heard before a new ALJ, despite the fact that the ALJ that heard his case had subsequently constitutionally appointed.

What remains to be seen is how federal courts will treat appeals by defendants from adverse administrative decisions in cases where an objection was made to the constitutionality of the presiding judge. Did the SEC remedy the issue in these cases completely when the Commissioners appointed the five administrative judges or will new proceedings be required? If so, can the same judge who heard a case before his/her appointment by the Commissioners, then hear the same case a second time? Perhaps most importantly, will litigants succeed in bringing challenges to the constitutionality of presiding ALJs in other governments agencies such as the Social Security Administration, which employs more than 1,400 ALJs who oversee more than 700,000 cases a year? While Lucia involved highly specific facts, the logic of the majority opinion would appear to apply to agencies outside the SEC.

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 205
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Michael M. Besser, Associate, Polsinelli, Government Investigations, False Claims Act Defense, internal investigation matters
Associate

As a member of Polsinelli's Government Investigations practice, Michael Besser helps clients mitigate risk and resolve collateral consequences in a practical and efficient way, while minimizing impact on their business and reputation. He assists seasoned Polsinelli attorneys with the representation of individuals, organizations, and corporations in all aspects of white collar defense and internal investigations, from discovery through sentencing, including factual and legal research and motion practice. Michael also focuses his practice on False Claims Act Defense and...

978-758-3857
Edward Novak, Polsinelli Law Firm, Commercial Litigation Attorney
Shareholder

Edward Novak’s problem-solving skills, combined with his years of experience, enable him to assist clients facing government investigations in many areas, including health care, banking, securities, environment, education, government contracting, and civil rights. His many community contacts and the recognition of his legal peers give him credibility in dealing with clients’ adversaries. He is frequently called to serve as an expert witness or mediator in disputes involving business and government.

Ed also assists professionals, such as...

602-650-2020
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement