October 1, 2020

Volume X, Number 275

October 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New Proposed Federal Rules May Impact Telecom and Data Center Operators

Due to cybersecurity concerns, the U.S. government has placed significant restrictions on U.S. government agencies’ and federal government contractors’ (including prime contractors’ and subcontractors’) ability to do business with entities that have Chinese telecommunications companies in their “supply chain” or that create a “supply chain risk.” One such law is the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (the Act).1

The Department of Defense (DOD), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have issued an interim rule (the Interim Rule) seeking to implement portions of the Act, and amend the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) accordingly, and have solicited comments regarding clarifications or modifications to the Interim Rule prior to it becoming a permanent rule.

Effective Date of the Interim Rule: Aug. 13, 2019

Deadline for Comment: Oct. 15, 2019. Interested parties should submit written comments to the Regulatory Secretariat Division at the GSA.  

Substance of the Interim Rule

The Interim Rule revises the FAR to implement Section 889(a)(1)(A) of the Act, which prohibits federal agencies from procuring, obtaining, extending, or renewing a contract to procure or obtain any equipment, system, or service that uses “covered telecommunications equipment or services” as a “substantial or essential component”2 of any system or as a “critical technology” as part of any system (the Restriction). Contractors can seek waivers from the Restriction from the applicable agency or from the Director of National Intelligence.

“Covered telecommunications equipment or services” includes: (1) “[t]elecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities)”; (2) “[f]or the purpose of public safety, security of Government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities)”; (3) “[t]elecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment”; or (4) “[t]elecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country,” i.e., the People’s Republic of China. The following are excluded from the Restriction: (i) services connecting to third-party facilities (the Interim Rule identifies backhaul, roaming, and interconnection arrangements as examples); and (ii) telecommunications equipment that cannot route or redirect user data traffic or permit visibility into any user data or packets that such equipment transmits or otherwise handles (the Interim Rule provides no examples).

The Interim Rule requires any contractor to report to the federal government if it uses or is notified by any subcontractor or any other source that “covered telecommunications equipment or services” is used as a “substantial or essential component” or a “critical technology” of its systems. The Interim Rule also requires contractors to include the substance of the rule in “all subcontracts and other contractual instruments, including subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items.”


Any telecommunications carrier or data center operator that utilizes “covered telecommunications equipment or services” either internally or to provide services to customers as a “substantial or essential component” of any system or as “critical technology” as part of any system during contract performance would be precluded from doing business with the federal government, directly or indirectly (i.e., as a prime contractor or subcontractor) under a plain reading of the language of the Act and the Interim Rule. A broad reading of the Interim Rule could prohibit the provision of a wide range of telecommunications and data center services, whereas a narrow reading could render them insignificant to many telecommunications and data center providers.

1 John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. No. 115-232, Aug. 13, 2018. 

2 “Substantial or essential component” means any component necessary for the proper function or performance of a piece of equipment, system, or service.

©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 226


About this Author

Kemal Hawa, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Northern Virginia and Washington DC, Corporate and Intellectual Property Attorney

Kemal Hawa focuses his practice on corporate and securities law, with an emphasis on the telecommunications, media and technology industries, domestically and internationally. Kemal regularly advises public and private companies, private equity firms, investment banks, and creditors’ committees on a variety of matters, including mergers and acquisitions, bankruptcies and restructurings, investments, financing arrangements, licensing agreements and commercial transactions.

Kemal specializes in the negotiation of transactions in the cloud...

Emily Naughton Communications Lawyer Greenberg Traurig Law Firm

Emily Naughton focuses her practice on transactions in the telecommunications, media and technology space, with an emphasis on cloud computing. Emily has represented clients in connection with real estate acquisitions, development projects and leases, mergers and acquisitions involving cloud service providers, and telecommunications network infrastructure deals. Emily has represented some of the world’s largest content providers globally in connection with network procurement and colocation and data center leases involving providers ranging from multinational companies to single facility operators.

Emily has experience representing property owners in the acquisition, financing and development of real estate; landlords and tenants in a variety of short- and long-term leases and subleases; and developers on complex land use and permitting matters. Emily has also represented contractors and subcontractors in the negotiation of construction contracts and disputes.

In addition to assisting clients on transactional matters, Emily has also regularly advised clients on general governance and operational issues from entity inception to dissolution.

Brett Castellat Employment Attorney

Brett A. Castellat represents government contractors on requests for equitable adjustments and in bid protests. He drafts protests before the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Small Business Administration (SBA) in disputes involving construction and defense contractors. He also focuses his practice on the representation of employers in a variety of industries regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) matters. Brett has also assisted in representation involving regulatory compliance under various regulatory frameworks, including the International Traffic...