May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The OFCCP’s Revised Scheduling Letter and NLRB Announcement Highlight Interagency Information Sharing

The Office of Management and Budget recently approved the Office of Federal Contract Compliance’s (OFCCP’s) use of its new Scheduling Letter and Itemized Listing through June 30, 2019. The new Scheduling Letter and Itemized Listing can be found here.

Most of the changes appear to be minor edits, but the changes describing the extent to which some information may or may not be considered confidential may have a big impact. The agency reports that its changes were intended to “strengthen the agency’s assurances of confidentiality for the information provided.” Previous Scheduling Letters stated that information provided by contractors would be treated by OFCCP as “sensitive and confidential,” and that disclosures would be made in line with the Freedom of Information Act. 

While the new Scheduling Letter refers specifically to laws governing the confidentiality of information with which OFCCP must comply, the (Freedom of Information Act, the Trade Secrets Act, the Privacy Act, and the 1987 Executive Order governing the disclosure of confidential commercial information), it does not reference the overall “sensitive and confidential” treatment of information cited in the prior Scheduling Letter. Rather, it highlights the OFCCP’s ability to share the information with other government agencies with which it has sharing agreements. The new Scheduling Letter states:

OFCCP may use the information you provide during a compliance evaluation in an enforcement action. We may also share that information with other enforcement agencies within DOL, as well as with other federal civil rights enforcement agencies with which we have information sharing agreements.

The revised Scheduling Letter is consistent with the OFCCP’s stated position that it would share information about violations which were discovered in the course of compliance reviews with other federal agencies. Whether this change in the proposed Scheduling Letter signals a more aggressive approach remains to be seen.  

Upon receipt of a Scheduling Letter and Itemized Listing, a federal contractor or subcontractor has 30 days to provide the lengthy list of required information. While the revised Scheduling Letter and Itemized Listing is not significantly different, it is worthwhile to review the information you as a covered federal contractor or subcontractor would be required to provide in a compliance review.

In a related vein, shortly after the approval of the new Scheduling Letter, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced that, beginning July 1, 2016, it would aid in the efforts of federal contractor compliance under the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order by requiring employers to post information related to all unfair labor practice complaints filed on or after July 1, 2016, including information about whether the employer is or has been a federal contractor. Notably the regulations implementing this Executive Order have not been issued and litigation is expected once they are issued. The intent of the NLRB is to create the federal database of “problem” employers and serves as a harbinger of other agency lists which will be created if the Executive Order is implemented. This information will be available to federal agency Labor Compliance Advisors that determine whether federal contractors are qualified to do business with the federal government. Despite the fact that the merits of unfair labor complaints have not yet been evaluated by an administrative law judge, these complaints must be posted to the federal database unless a contractor reaches a resolution in the case (such as a settlement) before the complaint is filed. 

©2022 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPNational Law Review, Volume VI, Number 194
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Farrah Rifelj, Michael Best Law Firm, Labor and Employment Attorney
Partner

Farrah serves Michael Best in two capacities: as Deputy General Counsel and as a partner in the Labor and Employment Relations Practice Group. Her practice focuses on employment counseling and employment litigation, with a particular emphasis on discrimination, noncompetition, and Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

Farrah provides management with astute advice on employment topics such as:

  • Affirmative action

  • Disability accommodation

  • ...
608-283-0110
Elizabeth N. Larson, Michael Best, Employment Discrimination Lawyer, Affirmative Action Compliance Attorney
Associate

Elizabeth focuses on employment discrimination, affirmative action, and Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) matters. Clients value her responsiveness, as well as her attention to detail, in these areas. They also look to her for support with trade secret and non-compete litigation.

Elizabeth previously served as a law clerk for MillerCoors where she researched a variety of legal matters including wage garnishments, disability discrimination, immigration law, alcohol and beverage law, privacy, and intellectual property. She...

414-225-8295
Marion Smith, Michael Best Law Firm, Director of Employment Relations and Compliance
Director of Employment Relations and Compliance

Marion applies her extensive experience to a broad range of complex labor and employment and strategic planning issues, working with our lawyers on behalf of Michael Best clients.

Clients turn to Marion for comprehensive executive search services and placement for public and private entities, as well as targeted search services assistance in areas ranging from background and reference checking to preparation and negotiation of initial employment agreements.

She also provides comprehensive management training in...

414-225-2760
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement