May 8, 2021

Volume XI, Number 128

Advertisement

May 07, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 06, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 05, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Playing Fair: Protect Trade Secrets from Business Partners

Collaborating with other companies on new products, services, and promotions can help businesses boost revenue and increase their visibility, but one downside of such projects is the possibility of exposing trade secrets to business partners.

Given this threat, it is important to have non-disclosure agreements in place with any business partner before any trade secret information is shared with anyone outside your company. Most companies do not want to steal other companies’ trade secrets, and open communication with competitors can also help both sides quickly resolve situations involving misappropriation, possibly avoiding costly and drawn-out litigation. In a famous example that ended in convictions for three co-conspirators, PepsiCo, Inc. reached out to The Coca-Cola Co. and passed along a letter they received that offered information about Coca-Cola’s confidential drink formulas. Coca-Cola, in turn, contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which conducted an undercover probe that led to the arrests of the accomplices and criminal convictions.

Agreements with business partners concerning confidentiality are particularly vital in industries with a lot of employee mobility — or widespread layoffs due to the coronavirus pandemic. Companies with employees working on projects with remote workers at other companies will want to take additional measures to protect trade secrets. Robust confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with business partners and development partners, as well as clauses that clarify intellectual property ownership in joint development arrangements, can lower the risk of trade secret theft and unauthorized use of confidential information.

Although teaming up with other companies increases the risk that they’ll gain unauthorized access to confidential information, making fair-play pacts with partners and competitors can go a long way toward curtailing the improper use of trade secrets.

In the next blog posting in our ongoing series on trade secrets, we’ll review how to minimize the threat of trade secret litigation when hiring an employee from a competing company.

Advertisement
©1994-2021 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 252
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Adam Samansky IP Attorney Mintz Law Firm
Member

Adam is an experienced IP litigator who primarily serves pharmaceutical, medical, high tech, and defense industry clients. He handles patent, trademark, and trade secret matters for innovators and investors. Adam has a strong record of success in multiparty, highly contested Hatch-Waxman litigation, in addition to other litigations involving advanced biochemistry, polymers, optics, manufacturing processes, and electronics. He has tried cases before multiple US district courts, briefed and argued cases before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and briefed bet-the-company...

617-348-1819
Nicholas W. Armington, mintz levin law firm, patent, IP, litigation attorney
Associate

Nicholas is a litigator with experience representing clients in United States District Courts and the International Trade Commission, among other venues. Nicholas’ practice focuses on patent and trade secret litigation and he has litigated cases in a variety of technology areas, including network devices, semiconductors, converged devices, LED lighting, and manufacturing devices.

In 2018-2019, Nicholas served as a Special Assistant District Attorney in the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office prosecuting criminal cases in the Framingham and Natick District...

1.617.348.4451
Advertisement
Advertisement