October 25, 2021

Volume XI, Number 298

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 25, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Regulatory Freeze Memorandum To Have Minimal Impact on Structured Finance Industry

On January 20, the Trump administration issued a memorandum instructing all executive departments and agencies to freeze the review and final publication of pending regulations (available here). The regulatory freeze does not directly affect the primary regulators that oversee the structured finance industry (such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Reserve System (Fed), Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)), so the immediate impact on the structured finance industry is expected to be minimal. The freeze should not apply to, for example, (1) the risk-based capital changes awaiting adoption in March by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision; (2) the Net Stable Funding Ratio, scheduled to be adopted by the FDIC, the Fed and the OCC in the first half of 2017; (3) the Arbitration Rule, deemed in the "final rule stage" by the CFPB; or (4) the Payday Loan and Deposit Advance Product Rule, deemed in the "proposed rule stage" by the CFPB.

The regulatory freeze was anticipated by many commentators as it was one of President Trump's campaign promises to ease the regulatory burden placed upon businesses. Parallel moves have been made by other administrations, including those of President George H.W. Bush in 1992 and President Barack Obama in 2009.

However, the regulatory freeze is just the first of many memoranda, orders, policy changes and/or agency leadership changes to come—many of which could, subject to required procedural and/or legislative steps (if any), potentially have significant implications for proposed, and even existing, rules and regulations. While the Trump administration's next move regarding regulatory reform remains unknown, one thing is certain: the process has just begun.

©2021 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 25
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Don Macbean, Katten Law Firm, Energy and Finance Attorney
Partner

Don J. Macbean represents financial institutions and other participants in a wide range of structured finance and derivatives transactions. His practice encompasses structured energy and commodity-related transactions, project finance and development, renewable energy, cash-flow and market-value collateralized loan obligations, credit-linked notes, and structured derivatives transactions. Don frequently represents clients on a variety of financing transactions, and has extensive experience advising clients with respect to master agreements, credit support arrangements...

212-940-8983
Joshua J. Yablonski, Katten Muchin, Commercial Underwriting Lawyer, Mortgage Backed Securities Attorney
Partner

Joshua J. Yablonski has extensive experience related to issues involving commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) transactions, representing a wide range of clients. He has represented issuers and underwriters in both public and private (144A) offerings of CMBS, including successfully handling the first Regulation AB II offering of a CMBS for the related issuer.

Josh has experience working on behalf of purchasers and servicers of mortgage- and asset-backed securities, warehouse facilities and commercial paper. He also focuses on innovative...

704-344-3061
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement