August 5, 2020

Volume X, Number 218

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

“Responsible Innovation" or a "Regulatory Train Wreck?" The OCC Announces it will Accept Fintech Applications for Special Purpose National Bank Charters

On July 31, 2018, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) announced that it will begin accepting applications from non-depository FinTech companies for special purpose national bank charters.   It’s a long-awaited announcement that represents the culmination of a two year process during which the OCC sought stakeholder feedback and public comment on the issue.

Among the notable points that the OCC makes in the policy statement are the following:

  • The OCC has the authority to issue special purpose charters to FinTech companies, an issue that was the subject of previously dismissed legal challenges brought by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (“CSBS”) and the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”). In the policy statement, the OCC reiterates its position that the National Banking Act and OCC regulations (12 C.F.R. § 5.20) authorize the agency to grant charters to  non-depository FinTech companies that engage in at least one of the “core banking activities” — lending, paying checks or deposit-taking — in addition to the special purpose charters for trust/fiduciary activities;
  • The OCC’s decision will benefit consumers by encouraging “responsible innovation” in the banking industry. The OCC states that its decision will expand consumer choice, foster innovation in the banking sector, and “level the playing field” between regulated and non-regulated banking services institutions while ensuring FinTech companies operate safely and soundly;
  • FinTech companies will be held to the same standards and supervision as their similar non-FinTech counterparts, including requirements concerning capital, liquidity, and risk management. OCC-chartered FinTech companies will also be required to maintain a contingency plan for significant financial stress scenarios. The special purpose national bank will not be required to be FDIC-insured, since they will be non-depository institutions; and
  • FinTech companies may engage in any activity deemed to be permissible for a national bank.

The OCC also released a supplement to the Comptroller’s Licensing Manualentitled “Considering Charter Applications From Financial Technology Companies”, which provides additional details about these and other requirements (available here).

The OCC’s announcement was not greeted with universal praise.  The CSBS, for example, called the decision “a regulatory train wreck in the making,” arguing that the policy “exceeds the current authority granted by Congress to the OCC.”

The new policy raises several questions, including: how many FinTech companies will actually apply for a charter, in light of the application of federal regulations that would not otherwise apply to a special purpose charter? What impact will the financial inclusion and contingency risk exposure plan requirements have on potential applicants? Will the CSBS and the NYDFS renew their legal challenges to the OCC’s authority to grant such charters, and will they be successful?

Copyright 2020 K & L GatesNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 218

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Rebecca Laird, Financial Institutions Attorney, KL Gates Law Firm
Of Counsel

Ms. Laird practices in the area of financial institutions law.  Her clients are commercial banks, trust companies, savings banks, savings associations and their holding companies.  Her practice includes:

  • representation of financial institutions before state and Federal bank and securities regulatory agencies, including:  the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission;
  • counseling clients on mergers and acquisitions, interstate branching, trust operations and...
202.778.9038
Eric A. Love, KL Gates, Capital Markets Compliance Lawyer, Treasury Legislation Attorney
Law Clerk

Eric A. Love is a member of K&L Gates’ Public Policy and Law Practice and is based in the Washington, D.C. office. Mr. Love focuses on federal legislative and regulatory policy issues related to financial services and capital markets, with a particular emphasis on securities and corporate governance. 

Prior to joining K&L Gates, Mr. Love served as a special assistant in the Office of Legislative Affairs at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In this capacity, he worked to help advance Treasury’s legislative agenda on a broad portfolio of international economic issues, including international financial services regulation, development, banking and securities, trade and investment, climate finance and monetary affairs. 

Immediately before joining Treasury, Mr. Love served for six years in a number of positions in the office of Congressman Melvin L. Watt of North Carolina, including as the senior legislative staff member responsible for advising the Congressman on all issues within the jurisdiction of the House Financial Services Committee.

202-778-9415
Daniel Cohen, KL Gates Law Firm, Washington DC, Finance Law Attorney
Associate

Daniel Cohen is a first year associate in the Washington, D.C. office.

Admitted only in Virginia / Not Admitted in D.C.
Supervised by Soyong Cho, member of D.C. Bar

202-778-9020