May 16, 2022

Volume XII, Number 136

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 16, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 13, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Securities Law Risk Mitigation in EB-5 Offerings

EB-5 regional centers and issuers take heed. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is pursuing litigation against parties in several EB-5 deals. We expect the SEC to increase efforts to prosecute regional centers, issuers and broker dealers who don’t play by the rules in the EB-5 investment industry. Mintz Levin’s EB-5 Financing Practice just released an alert on limiting securities litigation risks in EB-5 transactions. This is go-to reading for anyone in the EB-5 industry. Here are the highlights of the article, along with a few of our thoughts about concerns that borrowers need to have before accepting direct proceeds in loans from EB-5 regional centers.

The “Top Five” EB-5 Violations 

What lands regional centers and issuers in hot water with the SEC? Here are the top five recurring themes in EB-5 cases:

  1. Diversion and misappropriation of investor funds to projects not disclosed to investors

  2. Failure to disclose material facts such as self-dealing in a private placement memorandum

  3. False statements about the projected performance of a business, or about the use of EB-5 funds

  4. Omission of important facts (e.g., bankruptcy of a developer) from offering documents

  5. Siphoning EB-5 funds for personal use

What steps should you take now to mitigate your risk of securities litigation?

We expect law abiding regional centers and issuers to be swept up into the SEC’s broader enforcement net in the coming year. In other words, we think that no matter where you stand in an EB-5 transaction, you should expect to have some level of exposure and therefore should take steps now to secure your deal. Here are a few tips we offer in our article:

First, know the parties selling your deal abroad. Material misstatements in the sales process made by a promoter to an investor can cost you later. Review all marketing materials with securities counsel to ensure that these materials do not contain any misstatements.

Second, know your deal so that your oral statements are always correct when you speak with investors. It is also important to have training and counsel from a securities lawyer on what you may and may not say about your deal before you enter the market.

Third, do not enter the EB-5 marketplace until your deal terms are final. Having multiple versions of a private placement memo circulated makes the offering more difficult to manage—and increases the risk that there will be confusion in the market among investors.

Fourth, an issuer should consult qualified counsel to know whether a specific fact or event is material to disclose to investors in an EB-5 deal. Omissions of material facts can lead the SEC or investors to claim later that you have run afoul of Rule 10b-5.

Finally, get advice on disclosures. Many EB-5 transactions involve related-party transactions and self-dealing. Such transactions necessitate experienced securities counsel precisely to ensure that investors have access to material information.

Strategic Tip: Borrowers in EB-5 Deals Should Also Mitigate Securities Litigation Risks

While issuers and regional centers are the focus of EB-5 litigation right now and into the foreseeable future, if you are taking direct proceeds as a borrower in a transaction facilitated by an EB-5 regional center or issuer you need to have legal advice on the scope of your liability in a deal. Many large-scale EB-5 transactions are driven by a regional center that is facilitating a loan to a project or EB-5 borrower. Borrowers in such transactions often operate under the misconception that they are insulated from liability because they are not an issuer, and that this “insulation” means no accountability to the SEC or to investors.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

The SEC may name an EB-5 borrower in a transaction as a relief defendant in a civil action against a regional center or issuer. An asset freeze, disgorgement and reputational harm, among others, are all possible outcomes if a borrower receives direct proceeds of a toxic EB-5 deal that lands in litigation. The SEC also has the power to sue persons who aid and abet a violation of the securities laws. Borrowers in EB-5 transactions should have protective indemnification agreements in place before receiving EB-5 proceeds; review offering materials to ensure the accuracy of any facts represented to investors about their projects; know the background and experience of the EB-5 regional center before closing a deal; and have separate counsel from the EB-5 regional center controlling the offering process.

©1994-2022 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume V, Number 348
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Douglas Hauer, Corporate Immigration Attorney, Mintz Levin, Immigration EB-5 Financing Securities & Capital Markets Israel
Member

Doug is a noted authority on the EB-5 investor visa program, which gives developers a path for securing capital for real estate, hospitality, and infrastructure projects. His fluency with the program makes Doug an essential resource for companies looking for financing from offshore sources. International entrepreneurs and companies also rely on him when launching a business within the borders of the US. He is ideally positioned to advise clients on immigration and corporate law issues that arise in doing business in the US. 

Doug is a Member in the firm's Corporate & Securities...

617-348-3044
Adam Sisitsky, Mintz Leving Law Firm, Boston, Corporate and Litigation Law Attorney
Member

Adam is an experienced trial attorney and litigator whose practice encompasses a wide range of matters focusing on business and securities litigation, internal investigations, and government enforcement actions. Adam represents corporations, officers, directors, accountants, and other individuals in SEC investigations and enforcement proceedings, as well as in civil litigation. He routinely counsels public and private companies and others in matters involving compliance issues, including matters arising under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

...
617-348-1689
Francis J. Earley, Mintz Levin, Complex Commercial Disputes Attorney, Class Action Suits Lawyer
Member

Frank is a litigator who skillfully handles a broad range of complex commercial and securities disputes. He frequently represents individuals and public and private companies across numerous sectors, advising on corporate governance issues in cases that challenge, among other things, the terms of a merger or acquisition and directors’ and officers’ actions with regard to the transaction. Representing a wide array of clients in class action cases, SEC investigations and enforcement proceedings, FINRA proceedings, and other arbitration matters is another major part of his practice. Frank is...

212-692-6230
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement