May 19, 2019

May 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

UK Consumer Price Inflation: Confusion Reigns on CPI?

CPIH is to become the preferred method of UK Consumer Price Inflation from March 2017, according to a statement issued by the National Statistician on 10 November 2016. This follows a wide-ranging and long-lasting process of consultation and consideration. But what will be the impact on UK pensions?

Pension inflation measures have been in the news a lot recently (see this Pensions Expert report). In July the gap between CPI and RPI grew to its highest level for 5 years, with the 1.3% disparity a particular concern for the sponsors of pension plans that have RPI hard-wired into their rules.

The prospect of an appeal in the Barnardo’s case gave a crumb of comfort to those employers who were hoping that RPI could be treated as “replaced” even though it continues to be published. However, the Court of Appeal judgment in November upheld the earlier decision that as long as RPI exists it has not been replaced.

Now, we finally have some output from the consultation on consumer prices that closed over 12 months ago. In summary:

  • CPIH (which includes an element of housing costs) will become the preferred measure of consumer price inflation from March 2017, giving it a higher status than CPI.

  • RPIJ (a variant on RPI) will cease to be published from March 2017, but RPI will continue to be published given that it continues to be used very widely.

The main pension question arising from the statement is whether CPIH will replace CPI as the statutory basis for pension inflation. The BBC reports that the Treasury has no plans to adopt CPIH for pension uprating purposes, but former Pensions Minister Steve Webb has said on social media that CPIH should now be used by the Treasury for these purposes.

As CPIH is typically higher than CPI, it would add to the cost of pension provision and therefore frustrate the sponsors of plans who have been able to move to CPI. However, the reduced gap with RPI may lessen the blow for sponsors of plans that are stuck with RPI.

What binds all interested parties together is a desire for certainty, and so it would be helpful for the Treasury to make a public statement on the issue, either in this month’s Autumn Statement or otherwise

© Copyright 2019 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Matthew Giles Pension Attorney Squire Patton Boggs Law Firm
Partner

Matthew Giles is an attorney who leads Squire Patton Boggs' team of Pensions lawyers in Birmingham. The wider Pensions team was named Human Resources (Specialism) Firm of the Year 2018 at The Legal 500 UK Awards.

He is a former finalist at the British Legal Awards. He is regarded as a "Leading Individual" in Pensions by The Legal 500 UKChambers UK reports that he has a “practical, no-nonsense approach.”

Matthew specialises in advising on defined benefit pension plans, focussing on a range of deficit...

+44 121 222 3296