Brad Scheller is a trial attorney who focuses his patent litigation practice on representing clients in the automotive devices, thermoplastics, electronic components and consumer products industries in federal district court, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and at the International Trade Commission. With a background in mechanical engineering and over 14 years of experience practicing law, Brad has successfully represented patent owners in enforcing their rights against infringers and protecting those rights from challenges of invalidity, and has also successfully defended and negotiated settlements for client innovators accused of infringement and unfair commercial practices.
Brad focuses his litigation practice on patent disputes in Federal District Courts, including the Eastern District of Texas, Southern District of California, District of Delaware, Northern District of California and the Eastern District of New York, as well as at the International Trade Commission. Brad has handled disputes involving a variety of technologies, including electric motors, thermoplastics, electrical components, electronic payment and financial systems, computer software and various consumer products, including cosmetics, video game systems and personal watercraft.
Brad also has extensive experience in inter partes review (IPR) and covered business method patent review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and repeatedly defends and successfully preserves the rights of patent owners before this tribunal. He is well-versed in the particularities of post-grant proceedings from both the petitioner and patent owner perspective and provides comprehensive post-grant counseling to clients, including advising on post-grant proceedings concurrent with federal district court litigation and International Trade Commission investigations. As a registered patent attorney, Brad enjoys representing his clients in patent office proceedings on a variety of technologies.
Brad also counsels individual inventors and emerging ventures on product development strategies, renders patent clearance and validity opinions and manages the preparation and prosecution of patent applications and portfolios in various high-technology and consumer products fields.
Brad is Co-Editor for and contributor to the Mintz Global IP Matters blog and co-chairs the firm’s Post-Grant Working Group committee.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Brad M. Scheller
- Can Infringement Contentions be Amended to Add New Claims Resulting from an Ex Parte Reexam Filed after IPRs Invalidated Some but Not All Claims? - (Posted On Tuesday, November 05, 2019)
- Precedential PTAB Panel Says Petitioners Can Join Their Own Earlier-Filed IPRs and Join New Issues in Limited Circumstance - (Posted On Tuesday, March 19, 2019)
- Supreme Court Holds AIA Did Not Alter the Settled Meaning of “On Sale” - (Posted On Tuesday, January 22, 2019)
- PTAB Adopts the Phillips Claim Construction Standard in AIA Proceedings - (Posted On Thursday, October 11, 2018)
- PTAB Denies Institution of IPR after Successive Petitions by Unrelated Co-Defendants - (Posted On Tuesday, September 11, 2018)
- Establishing Obviousness: A Fundamental Case of Evidence Over Arguments - (Posted On Thursday, March 01, 2018)
- The Medicines Company v. Hospira Inc. - (Posted On Wednesday, February 14, 2018)
- SAS v. Matal – Overview of Oral Argument - (Posted On Tuesday, December 12, 2017)
- PTAB Guidance on Motions to Amend in View of Aqua Products - (Posted On Thursday, November 30, 2017)
- Federal Circuit Affirms Delaware Alice Decision - (Posted On Thursday, November 16, 2017)