Charlie Einsiedler is an experienced practitioner in all aspects of labor and employment law. He has an active practice advising employers on a wide range of benefits compliance issues such as COBRA, HIPAA, USERRA and the FMLA.
Charlie regularly counsels employers, providing preventive advice and practical solutions to the day-to-day problems confronting businesses large and small. He has a significant, traditional labor practice dealing with unions and has represented employers in strikes, union election campaigns, contract negotiations, railway labor, and employment litigation. He has also led successful court challenges to statutes and regulations intended to restrict employer flexibility.
Charlie has represented public and private employers in Maine and New Hampshire from diverse industries, including pulp and paper, textiles, health care, utilities, transportation, construction, and retail in union-organizing campaigns, arbitrations and unfair labor practice claims. He frequently advises unionized employers concerning contract interpretation, benefits and negotiation issues, and represents employers in both grievance and interest arbitrations. Charlie has been actively involved in strike preparation, planning and implementation and litigation arising out of the region's largest strikes. He has obtained numerous temporary restraining orders against unlawful union picketing conduct during strikes.
Charlie frequently appears before the region's Human Rights Commissions and the EEOC on discrimination matters and is often involved in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), including mediation and arbitration of employment disputes in an effort to avoid litigation.
Charlie has led the successful challenge to several legislative and administrative attempts to restrict employers. For example, he was lead counsel for the Maine Chamber of Commerce and Industry in its Amicus Brief to the Justices of Maine's Supreme Judicial Court resulting in a unanimous opinion that proposed legislation to restrict an employer's right to hire replacements during a work stoppage was unconstitutional. He successfully obtained a preliminary injunction in U.S. District Court against a Municipal Ordinance designed to obstruct an employer's ability to operate during a strike. He obtained a judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine holding that the so-called Railroad Employees Equity Act-which imposed significant burdens upon new rail carriers was unconstitutional. He also filed suit against regulations concerning Maine's wood measurement laws. As a result of that lawsuit, the Attorney General's office withdrew the regulations and promulgated new regulations.
Articles in the National Law Review database by Charles S. Einsiedler, Jr.