Michael is a highly regarded intellectual property litigator and patent strategist who helps clients protect and generate revenue from their patent holdings. Intellectual Asset Magazine has repeatedly recognized him in its select IAM Patent 1000 and IAM Patent Strategy 300 publications. Clients rely on his counsel regarding sensitive licensing agreement negotiations, acquisitions, and other technology transactions. He leads a team known for its ability to translate complex technology and its value to non-technical professionals — in court and business negotiations.
Michael is Division Head for the Intellectual Property Section at Mintz and serves as a member on the firm’s Policy Committee. He is an experienced litigator known for his business approach to creating value in patent assets. His success on behalf of clients comes from his ability to identify the value drivers in a portfolio and communicate that value to competitors, investors, purchasers, licensees, counsel, judges, and juries.
With a background in mechanical engineering and nearly 20 years’ experience practicing law, he has the combination of technical and legal skills essential to a strategic patent practice. He has achieved courtroom victories and negotiated favorable settlements on behalf of both patent owners and accused infringers in complex negotiations and protracted litigation.
Michael develops strategies for and guides clients through monetization programs for complex technology portfolios. Several recent monetization programs have each returned tens of millions of dollars through litigation, licensing, and sale activities.
Michael also advises clients on patent portfolio assessment and conducts IP due diligence in connection with transactions. He counsels private equity firms and venture capital funds on IP assets and patent value. He also helps patent owners develop and implement strategies for identifying and leveraging untapped assets in their patent portfolios.
He has particularly deep experience litigating Section 337 matters before the International Trade Commission and has also achieved significant success in Federal District Courts, including the Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware, Northern District of California, District of Massachusetts, and numerous others.
Michael’s technology experience includes electromechanical systems, digital cameras, embedded microprocessors, telecommunications and network software, cellular phones, and e-commerce, among others.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Michael T. Renaud
- Efficacy of Preliminary Injunction against Apple Called into Question? - (Posted On Wednesday, December 12, 2018)
- European Patent Office Issues New Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning - (Posted On Wednesday, November 07, 2018)
- Massachusetts Adopts Uniform Trade Secrets Act - (Posted On Thursday, September 06, 2018)
- The Patent Act Allows for Full Compensation for All Forms of Infringement - (Posted On Sunday, June 24, 2018)
- Discovery Concerning Potential Litigation Funding is Not Relevant or Proportional - (Posted On Thursday, June 14, 2018)
- Willfulness Finding in EDTX Ruling in TCL v. Ericsson Illustrates the Risk to Accused Infringers of Failing to Investigate Allegations - (Posted On Thursday, May 17, 2018)
- Upon Reconsideration, E.D.Tex. Judge Affirms Ericsson’s Previously-Vacated Jury Award Against TCL - (Posted On Wednesday, May 16, 2018)
- Two Supreme Court Patent Opinions and a Memo from the PTO - (Posted On Friday, April 27, 2018)
- District Court Grants Protection under DTSA Whistleblower Immunity for First Time - (Posted On Friday, April 06, 2018)
- Patent Damages: How Many Essential Features in a Smart Phone? - (Posted On Friday, March 30, 2018)