Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Nov
6
2014
Brazil: An Update of the Most Relevant Events for Pharmaceutical Companies in 2014: Part 2 of a 5-Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
6
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 6, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
6
2014
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc. v. Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review and Motion for Joinder IPR2014-01080 Faegre Drinker
Nov
5
2014
Recent Trends in Medical Device Patent Litigation at the ITC: Part 2 Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
5
2014
It’s a Material IP World: Trademarks, Copyrights, Design Patents and Fabric Designs Mintz
Nov
5
2014
Genetic Technologies v. Bristol Myers – 101 At Work Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
5
2014
The Orphan and the Unknown Soldier re: Orphan Copyright Works Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Nov
5
2014
Custom Device Exemption Remains Narrow, but FDA’s Final Guidance Addresses Industry Concern About “Device Type” Definition Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
5
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 5, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
5
2014
FedEx Corporation v. IpVenture, Inc.: Granting Second Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Petition IPR2014-00833 Faegre Drinker
Nov
5
2014
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech v. Millenium Biologix: Denying Request for Rehearing the Order that Petitioner’s Reply Evidence will not be Considered IPR2013-00582, 590 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Depositions: Civility and Decorum Must Prevail McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
4
2014
PTAB Denies Petitioner’s Second Bite at the Apple Armstrong Teasdale
Nov
4
2014
Alice: It’s No Use Going Back to Yesterday Because I Was a Different [Patent] Then Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
4
2014
International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00681 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
Case Digest: Weber-Stephen Products LLC v. Sears Holding Corporation Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
The Era of Generic Biologic Drugs Has Officially Begun: An Update on U.S. Biosimilars [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
4
2014
E*Trade, Scottrade, TD Ameritrade v. Droplets, Inc.: Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2014
PTAB Adopts Broad View of Inherency Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00288 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
Canadian Hospital To Travel The Long And Winding Road Of “Gene Patenting” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
3
2014
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc. v. Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC: Denying Institution and Joinder IPR2014-01078 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
New European Unity Rules in Effect November 1, 2014 Mintz
Nov
3
2014
PTAB Clarifies Permissible Use of Documents and Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
IPR Clock Runs Until Allegations Are Nullified McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
Oracle, YP Interactive, and Yellowpages.com v. Click-to-Call Technologies LP, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00312 Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2014
PTAB Denies Motion to Amend for Failure to Show Patentability McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
3
2014
FedEx Corporation v. IpVenture, Inc., Denying Motion to Correct Clerical Mistake IPR2014-00833 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
PTAB Does Not Rely on District Court’s Markman Decision in Construing Claim Terms McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Sustains Opposition on the Basis of Fraud McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Wireless Seismic, Inc. v Fairfield Industries, Inc., Denying Leave to File Supplemental Information IPR2014-01113 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2014
Specificity and Negotiation Are the Buzz Words for IPR Discovery McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Specificity Key in IPR Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
A Hypothetical-License Damages Theory Must Be Rooted in Non-Hypothetical Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
2
2014
Choose Your Battles Before the PTAB – 49 Basis Is Just Too Many! McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
European Court of Justice (ECJ) Rules on Digitization of Library Collections McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Patent Owner Must Prove Patentability of Proposed Amended Claims (Including Prior Art Date) McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Too Much Incorporation By Reference Dooms IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Not All Vice Presidents Are Officers and Entitled to Corporate Indemnification McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Timeliness – The Devil Is in the Details (a.k.a. Rules) McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
1
2014
Third Circuit: Octane Fitness Changes the Landscape for Trademark Cases Too McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2014
Divided PTAB Panel Denies Issue Joinder as a Matter of Law - Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2014
Westlake Services, LLC v. Credit Acceptance Corp., Denying Motion for Request to Stay the Proceeding CBM2014-00176 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2014
Phased Discovery in Patent Litigation: A Powerful Tool Within the Existing Litigation Framework for Combating Actions by Non-Practicing Entities Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Oct
31
2014
PTAB Designates Seven Recent Decisions as Informative McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Limited, Final Written Decision Update IPR2013-00266 Faegre Drinker
Oct
31
2014
Transformative Use in the Seventh Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2014
Method Implemented on Generic Computers Is Not Patent Eligible, but Method for Processing Paper Checks Is - Salesforce.com, Inc. v. Virtualagility, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp v. Solutrain, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2014
Inventor Testimony Without Corroborating Evidence Is Insufficient to Prove of Reduction to Practice - K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins