Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Sep
8
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 8, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
8
2014
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc., Decision on Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00259 Faegre Drinker
Sep
6
2014
New Balance Goes Toe-to-Toe with Karl Lagerfeld Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
5
2014
Update: The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 8 of a 10-Part Series: Australia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
5
2014
Australia: Cancer Voices v Myriad Opinion Affirmed Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
5
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 5, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
5
2014
Goertek, Inc. and Goertek Electronics, Inc. v. Knowles Electronics, LLC: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Stay Reexam IPR2014-01009 Faegre Drinker
Sep
5
2014
An Inside Look at International Trade Commission's (ITC) Expedited Investigations Pilot Program Analysis Group, Inc.
Sep
5
2014
REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00178 Faegre Drinker
Sep
4
2014
Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC: Bingo Invention Fails Abstract Idea Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2014
Wintek Corp. v. TPK Touch Solutions: Order Regarding Deposition Costs IPR2013-00567, IPR2013-00568, IPR2014-0054 Faegre Drinker
Sep
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
3
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 3, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
3
2014
Utility Patent Trends Gleaned from the IPO’s 2014 IP Record Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2014
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open - September 2014 Update Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2014
The Next Time Your Pet Takes a Selfie... Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2014
Why FLYING MONKEY WINE Never Got Off the Ground Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2014
K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00203 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2014
Employers on Either Side of Employee Poaching Should Consider Taking Some (Rather Easy) Steps to Better Protect Themselves Mintz
Sep
2
2014
Two-Party Market: Presumption of Confusion and Injury McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
2
2014
No “Correct” Pronunciation for Trademarks that Are Unrecognized Words McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
2
2014
Res judicata Does Not Bar Claims Arising After Prior Litigation, Even One Based on Similar Conduct McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Warrants an Ongoing “Reasonable Royalty” McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Assignor Estoppel and Motion to Amend Claims Both Tough Sells in Inter Partes Review McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Greetings! Use of the PowerPoint Is Trade Secret Misappropriation McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Copying Is Not the Ultimate Test for Copyright Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Threatens Sanctions for Unauthorized E-mails McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Inherency Is Tough to Prove—Even in Inter Partes Review (IPR) McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2014
Patentee Owner Must Show a Nexus Between Alleged Commercial Success and the Claimed Technology McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2014
The First Derivation Proceeding: Possession Not Enough: Need to Show Prior Conception of Claim Subject Matter McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2014
Intri-Plex Techs and MMI Holdings v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol: Order on Motions to Seal and for Entry of Protective Order Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2014
The Importance of the One-Year AIA Timeline McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2014
High Bar for Discovery Motions in Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs): Permobil Inc. v. Pridemobility Products Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. Surfcast, Inc.: Denying Request to Redact Oral Hearing Transcript Faegre Drinker
Aug
30
2014
U.S. Bancorp CBM Results in Cancellation of Retirement Capital Access Management Co.’s Patent Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
30
2014
Opinion Underlying Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) May Still Provide Basis for a New Trial, Even if JMOL Is Defective McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2014
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics, Inc.: Denying Rehearing Request IPR2014-00258 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
Patent Owner Bears Burden of Proving Proposed Claims Patentable McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
Injunction and Civil Contempt Remedy Vacated After PTO Cancels Claim in Reexamination McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
Standard Innovation Corporation v. Lelo, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Extension of Time: IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
A Powerful Tool: Challenging Assertion during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
29
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 29, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
29
2014
Federal Circuit Sidesteps Constitutionality of America Invents Act (AIA) First-to-File Provision McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
CustomPlay, LLC v. ClearPlay, Inc.: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision to Institute Review IPR2014-00383 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
Permitting Evidence on Appeal: Kappos v. Hyatt Applies Broadly to Raising New Issues in District Court Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
First Application of Alice Corp. Decision to Covered Business Method Patent Review McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc.: Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
The Heavy Burden of a Motion to Amend: LaRose Indus., LLC v. Capriola Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2014
Mexichem Amanco Holdings v. Honeywell International: Granting Authorization to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2013-00576 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
Patent Infringement Litigation: No Appellate Jurisdiction Over an Interlocutory Contempt Order McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins