Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
28
2014
Failure of Appellant to Appeal Damages Award Precludes District Court to Reconsider Damages After Partial Reversal McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2014
Federal Circuit Reverses ITC Violation of Its Own Rules - International Trade Commission McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2014
Third Circuit Holds Irreparable Harm May Not Be Presumed In Lanham Act False Advertising Cases To Establish Entitlement To Injunctive Relief Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
28
2014
Patent Owner Cannot Assert a Claim That Is Missing a Material Limitation McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2014
X2Y Attenuators, LLC v. International Trade Commission: Characterization as “Essential Element” Amounts to a Disavowal of Scope McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 8 of a 10-Part Series: Australia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
28
2014
Claim Scope Based on Claim Construction Submitted in Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2014
Neither Data Structures Nor Gathering and Combining Data Are Subject-Matter Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2014
Genus Claims Require Disclosure of “Representative Species Encompassing the Breadth of the Genus” McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2014
Selection Invention Found Unpatentable for Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
27
2014
Washington Redskins Challenge the Constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act Mintz
Aug
27
2014
Major Changes Enacted for Canadian Trademark Law Dickinson Wright PLLC
Aug
27
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 27, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
26
2014
Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. v. Aqua Products, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00159 Faegre Drinker
Aug
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2014
China Grants First Patents to Graphical User Interface Designs Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2014
SCHOTT Gemtron Corp. v. SSW Holding Co., Inc., Order Regarding Petition Filing Date IPR2014-00367 Faegre Drinker
Aug
25
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 25, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2014
Takeaways from Seattle Chisum Patent Academy Summer 2014 Seminars Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
22
2014
SCHOTT Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00358 Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2014
eBay Enterprise, Inc. and eBay Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood: Order Regarding Request to Expunge CBM2014-00025 Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2014
Monster Worldwide, Inc., Indeed, Inc., and theLadders.com, Inc. v. Career Destination Development, LLC: Decision on Institution of CBM Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
21
2014
MotionPoint Corporation v. TransPerfect Global, Inc.: Decision on Motion to Stay CBM2014-00060 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
Bear Archery, Inc. v. AMS, LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00700 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
Mexichem Amanco Holdings S.A. de C.V. v. Honeywell International, Inc.: Order Regarding Routine Discovery IPR2013-00576 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated: Order Regarding Motion to Seal IPR2014-00097, 98 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
Second Circuit Clarifies the Use of Legal Presumptions of Consumer Confusion and Injury in Certain Lanham Act Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2014
Callidus Software v. Versata Software and Versata Development Group: Denying Request for Additional Pages CBM2013-00052, 53, 54 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
21
2014
E Ink Corporation v. Research Frontiers Incorporated: Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00422 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2014
Bank of America, PNC Financial, and PNC Bank v. Intellectual Ventures II: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) CBM2014-00031 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2014
Safeway, Inc. and The Kroger Co. v. Kroy IP Holdings, LLC: Granting Request to File Exhibit IPR2014-00685 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc.: Decision on Rehearing of Institution IPR2014-00274 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 20, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
19
2014
Macronix v. Spansion LLC: Decision Denying Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Aug
19
2014
Trade Secrets on the Move Re: Trade Secret Misappropriation Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
19
2014
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corp.: Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00422 Faegre Drinker
Aug
19
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 19, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
19
2014
Google, the House of Lords and the timing of the EU Data Protection Regulation Mintz
Aug
19
2014
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., TD Ameritrade, Inc., and TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp. v. Trading Technologies International, Inc. Faegre Drinker
Aug
18
2014
A Dozen Reasons Why Growth Companies (and Their Investors) Seek Federal Trademark Registrations Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
18
2014
Understanding the Different Types of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Opinions Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
18
2014
China Solicits Public Comments on Copyright Law (Draft Revision for Review) Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
18
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
18
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 7 of a 10-Part Series: China Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
18
2014
Google Inc. and Apple Inc. v. Jongerius Panoramic Technologies, LLC Final Written Decision IPR2013-00191 Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2014
Schott Gemtron Corp. v. SSW Holding Co., Inc., Denying Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
Aug
17
2014
China Promulgates New Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law Greenberg Traurig, LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins