Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
May
31
2014
USPTO (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) Director’s Decision on Inter Partes Review Institution Is the Final Word McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Rule of Reason and Market Power Re: Antitrust, Tortious Interference and Patent Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Standards and Injunctions Under EU Competition Law McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Federal Circuit to Review Consideration of Induced Infringement at the ITC (International Trade Commission) En Banc McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Fourth Circuit Offers Detailed Guidance on Use of Experts to Establish Copyright Damages on Summary Judgment for Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
May
30
2014
Eastern District of Texas Can’t Keep Every Case Filed There McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Balancing Venue, Transfer Factors at the Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Pre-AIA (America Invents Act) Statute Did Not Give Patent Owner in an Ex Parte Reexamination the Right to Bring an Action in District Court McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
What Is “a Patient?” McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Just How Open Is that Automated Exchange? Re: International Securities Exchange McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., Order Granting Motion to Stay Reexam IPR2014-00043 Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Synopsys, Inc. Denying Request for Authorization to File Motion to Supplement IPR2014-00287 Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 30, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
30
2014
Fujian Newland Computer Co., Ltd. v. Hand Held Products, Inc.: Order Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Exclude Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
Misrepresentation of Source Claims Re: Foreign Trademark Registration Katten
May
30
2014
PCT International, Inc. v. Amphenol Corporation Summary of Conference Concerning Newly Discovered Prior Art IPR2013-00229 Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
This International Shoe Doesn’t Fit: Subsidiary May Not Be Parent’s Agent Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
May
30
2014
Contingent Payment Installment Sales—A Seller’s Dilemma McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc. Granting Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Additional Discovery Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
Identifying and Mitigating Liabilities in Medical Device M&A McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2014
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Unifi Scientific Batteries, LLC, Order Dismissing in Part Motion to Exclude IPR2013-00236 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2014
Ultratec, Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., Captioncall, LLC, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, Order Providing Guidance on Motions to Exclude and Strike IPR2013-00288 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2014
Microsoft v. DataTern, Inc.: Suppliers May Declaratory Judgment an NPE, But It Won’t Be Easy McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Order Regarding Formatting of Petitions IPR2013-00547, 548, 552, 553 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2014
A Few Good Trademarks: The U.S. Military’s Trademark Campaign - OOHRAH! Mintz
May
29
2014
“Commercially Reasonable Efforts” Diligence Obligations in Life Science M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
Combining Two Drugs Is Not Always Obvious: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
Insufficient Evidence of Substantial Revenue Derived in Georgia to Support Camouflage Copyright Infringement Claim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
29
2014
Design Patents Go to the Dogs: District Court Not Required to Provide an Express Verbal Description of the Claimed Design McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 29, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
29
2014
A Combination of References Need Only Provide a “Reasonable Expectation of Success” McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
An Overview of Biosimilars in the Russian Federation Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
29
2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Pi-Net Int’l, Inc.: Order Denying Motion to Stay Petitions Faegre Drinker
May
29
2014
Patent Owner Practicing the Patent Not Necessary to Secure Preliminary Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2014
Federal Circuit Grants Emergency Stay of Preliminary Injunction for Critical Medical Products McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2014
The Jewelry Channel, Inc. v. America’s Collectibles Network, Inc.: Order Denying Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
Gilead Warns: Examine Patent Portfolios for Double Patenting Pitfalls McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2014
North Carolina Legislative Update - May 28, 2014 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
28
2014
K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc.: Granting Motion for Live Testimony at Hearing IPR2013-00203 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
Federal Circuit to Judge Posner: eBay Analysis Is a Must - Apple, Inc. et al. v. Motorola, Inc., et al. McDermott Will & Emery
May
28
2014
Avaya Inc., Dell Inc., Sony Corp. of America, and Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc., Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2013-00071 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
28
2014
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
The Scotts Company LLC v. Encap, LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Denial of Institution IPR2013-000491 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. Denying Patent Owner’s Motions to Seal and Granting Petitioner’s Motion to Seal IPR2013-00453 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00099 Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
EMC Corporation v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00086 Faegre Drinker
May
27
2014
Focal Therapeutics, Inc. v. Senorx, Inc, Decision on Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00116 Faegre Drinker
May
27
2014
Aker Biomarine AS v. Neptune Technologies and Bioressources Inc., Request for Rehearing Results in Board Modifying Previous Order to Deny Further Grounds Faegre Drinker
May
27
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 27, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins