Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
2
2016
Texas Supreme Court Examines Liability for Property Owners Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Feb
2
2016
Federal Circuit Holds Defective Restriction Requirement Ends Patent Term Adjustment Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
2
2016
Supreme Court Holds Rejected Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Does Not Moot Class Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
2
2016
Is "Plausibility" a Rorschach Test? Fourth Circuit's Divided Opinion on Twombly's Motion to Dismiss Standard Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
2
2016
Supreme Court Affirms FERC Demand Response Authority Mintz
Feb
2
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 2, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
2
2016
EEOC May Obtain Private (And Arguably Unnecessary) Employee Information Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
1
2016
U.S. Supreme Court Agreed to Hear Important Regulatory Takings Case, Murr v. Wisconsin Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
1
2016
California Court of Appeal Holds Employee’s Agreement to Reimburse Training Costs in Event of Resignation Does Not Offend Public Policy Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
1
2016
Goldman Sachs To Pay $5 Billion To Settle Mortgage-Backed Securities Fraud Claims Tycko & Zavareei LLP
Feb
1
2016
Developments in Spousal Rights under Employee Benefit Plans (Part I) Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Feb
1
2016
Tag, You’re It: Biometric Information Privacy Act Class Action Against Shutterfly Moves Past 12(b)(6) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
1
2016
Online Targeted Advertisements are Not Sufficient to Establish Personal Jurisdiction in Wisconsin Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
1
2016
Retaliation Claims Are Difficult to Defend: Redux Murtha Cullina
Feb
1
2016
Can the Government Unlock my Cell Phone? Companies' Heightened Security Features to Protect Customer Privacy Affects DOJ Investigations Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
1
2016
Pfizer v. Lee: A Patent Term Adjustment Double Standard? Mintz
Feb
1
2016
More Bad News for Bankruptcy Professionals – Baker Botts v ASARCO is Back Like Boomerang Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
1
2016
Judge Denies Neiman’s Motion to Dismiss Data Breach Class Action Covington & Burling LLP
Feb
1
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 1, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
1
2016
Supreme Court Tells Insurers Not to Twiddle Their Thumbs ArentFox Schiff LLP
Feb
1
2016
Another Twist in Cat-and-Mouse Game of Plan Recoveries of Third-Party Reimbursements Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
1
2016
Are You Being Nosy or Burying Your Head? re: Employment Law Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Feb
1
2016
Inphi v. Netlist: Alternative Features Satisfy Patent Written Description Requirement for Negative Claim Limitation Mintz
Feb
1
2016
Browning-Ferris Appeals ‘Joint Employer’ Decision to U.S. Court of Appeals Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
1
2016
Investment Company Act And Roy M. Cohn Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jan
31
2016
The Shadow of Yard-Man Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
31
2016
Plaintiff Secures Sweeping Jury Verdict in Hotly-Contested Patent Fight Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
30
2016
Guzman v. Hacienda Records and Recording Studio: No Appellate “Second Guessing” of Witness Credibility Determinations McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2016
Killer Joe Nevada, LLC v. Leaverton: Dismissal but No Fees for Innocent BitTorrent Defendant McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2016
Don’t Cry Over Spilled Paint — Sue! VARA Claim Filed Against Detroit Real Estate Company Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
30
2016
The EU Court of Justice Brings to an End Odile Jacob’s Fight Against Lagardère’s Purchase of Vivendi Universal Publishing McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Hold Your Horses: A Plaintiff’s Long Rap Sheet Might Not Get You to the Finish Line Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
29
2016
Party Raising “First Sale” Defense to Copyright Infringement Bears Initial Burden of Proof McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
IPR Survives Despite Petitioner Failure to Name All Real Parties of Interest McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Disparagement Proscription of § 2(a) Is Unconstitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Massachusetts: Relating a Software Copyright Infringement Claim Back to its Source Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
29
2016
Suggestion of Control Not Enough for RPI Challenge; Nexus Matters for Commercial Success McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Global Tel*Link Corp. v. Securus Techs: Claims Unpatentable and Motion to Amend to Correct Typographical Errors Denied in Final Written Decision IPR2014-01278 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 29, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
29
2016
CFPB Director’s Divisive View of RESPA Limitations Period Central to Ongoing UDAAP Action Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
29
2016
“Substantial Evidence” Review Dooms PTAB Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
HTC Corporation and HTC America v. Advanced Audio Devices: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claim Unpatentable IPR2014-01158 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
Facebook Not Subject to Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Illinois Vedder Price
Jan
29
2016
NRT Tech. Corp. et al. v. Everi Payments: Denying Institution of CBM Asserting Patent Ineligibility and Prior Art Under Section 102(e) CBM2015-00167 Faegre Drinker
Jan
29
2016
Part 3 – Foreign Filing Restrictions and Licenses in India Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
29
2016
What Is the Printed Matter Doctrine? McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Patent Petitioners: Put All Needed Evidence in Your Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2016
Supreme Court Sides with FERC on Wholesale Demand Response Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
29
2016
What Happens on Remand of a PTAB Inter Partes Review Decision from the Federal Circuit? McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
28
2016
Supreme Court to Consider (1) PTAB AIA Claim Construction and Reviewability of Institution Decisions and (2) Attorney Fee Awards in Copyright Cases McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins