May 20, 2022

Volume XII, Number 140

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 18, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Deadlocked But Not Out Of Options Re: Corporate Board of Directors

While not prohibited by the General Corporation Law, a board comprised of an even number of directors suffers from one potential disability.  It can become deadlocked.  When that unfortunate situation arises, there are options.

One option involves a judicial appointment of a provisional director.  Pursuant to Corporations Code Section 308, any director or the holder(s) of not less than 33 1/3 percent of the voting power may petition the Superior Court for the appointment of a provisional director.  In order to obtain this relief, the following conditions must be met:

  • There must be an even number of directors;

  • The directors must be equally divided;

  • The directors must not agree as to the management of the corporation’s business so that

    • the business can no longer be conducted to advantage; or

    • there is a danger that the corporation’s property and business will be impaired or lost.

(As an aside, I can imagine the possibility of an odd number of directors who are equally divided, but Section 308 doesn’t appear to reach that situation.)

The provisional director must have both positive and negative characteristics.  On the positive side, she must be “an impartial person”.  On the negative side, she must not be:

  • A shareholder;

  • A creditor; or

  • Related by consanguinity or affinity within the third degree according to the common law to:

    • Any of the other directors; or

    • Any judge of the court appointing the provisional director.

A provisional director has all of the rights and powers of a director, but her life expectancy is short.  The code provides that she has these rights and powers until the deadlock is broken or until she is removed by the court or approval of the outstanding shares (Section 152).

This is but one option that may be available in the case of a deadlock.  I’ll try to address others in a future post.

© 2010-2022 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume III, Number 316
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement