Constitutional Law

The Constitution is a document constantly analyzed for its impact and meaning, and how the principles within apply to modern legal issues. Litigation happens on a regular basis in the circuit courts and the Supreme Court that impacts the way the Constitution is interpreted, and the National Law Review has legal analysis on these cases and interpretations, as well as predictions on how these cases might land.

The First Amendment Right to Free Speech, the Right to Protection Against Unreasonable Search and Seizure under the Fourth Amendment, Due process violations under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Government’s Power of Eminent Domain, afforded under the Fifth Amendment, are among the leading stories and news visitors will read about on the National Law Review. How these provisions might apply to modern scenarios not envisioned by the Founding Fathers is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

The Establishment Clause and Dormant Commerce Clause under the Fifth and First Amendments, and Anti-discrimination laws under the First Amendment are some of the topics covered by the National Law Review. Visitors can read about Constitutional issues in litigation, including Article III, which affords a party to bring forth a case at the federal or state level. The constitutionality of administrative proceedings against Administrative agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and agencies that govern immigration like the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), are among the different types of commentary and stories visitors will read about on the site.

The National Law Review covers topics related to all Amendments under the Constitution, citizens' and civil rights, agency rights, and the different clauses which are set forth under those amendments. For visitors who want to learn about the latest challenges to the Constitution or Amendments, Supreme Court Decisions, and cases that set forth new precedent, based on the Constitution and Constitutional rights, can find these stories on the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Sep
15
2020
First Amendment Litigation and California's Proposition 65: Conversation with Trenton Norris
Sep
23
2019
New York Times v. Sullivan Supreme Court Decision and its Impact on Libel Law: the Case, the Context and the Consequences
Oct
17
2018
Texas Judge issues Permanent Injunction on Fetal Remains Law: Women’s Whole Health v. Charles Smith
Mar
14
2023
Recent NLRB and Supreme Court Decisions May Significantly Affect Severance Agreements and Compensation Practices Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
18
2023
Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. – The United States Supreme Court Upholds Consent-Based Theory of General Jurisdiction Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Sep
10
2013
Illinois' Firearm Concealed Carry Act Need Not Strike Fear In the Hearts of Employers Much Shelist, P.C.
Sep
10
2013
The End of Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA): What it Means for Employee Benefits Much Shelist, P.C.
Nov
6
2009
Think Before You Speak: Avoid Becoming a Defendant in a Defamation Lawsuit Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
26
2014
The Walls Shouldn’t Have Ears: Ruling on Eavesdropping Puts Burden of Prevention on Illinois Employers Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
22
2010
Employer Searches of Electronic Communications: U.S. Supreme Court Weighs In Much Shelist, P.C.
Feb
16
2012
The First Amendment and the Reporter's Privilege: What Constitutes News on the Internet? Much Shelist, P.C.
Jul
30
2013
Considerations for US Employers Post-Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
21
2016
Not Taking “Yes” For An Answer: U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Unaccepted Offer Of Complete Individual Relief Does Not Moot Plaintiff’s Individual Or Class Action Claim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2020
Rolls-Royce Seeks to Resolve Circuit Split on Whether District Courts Can Order Discovery For Use in Private Arbitration Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
13
2013
Showdown in the Richmond: The City of Richmond Threatens Eminent Domain on Underwater Loans Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
26
2016
State Agency’s Intentional Flooding for Environmental Protection Results in Physical Taking of Private Property – Strict Liability Applies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
23
2019
AB 1291 Forces California Cannabis Companies To Sign “Labor Peace Agreements” With Unions, But Statute May be Unconstitutional Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2024
Cannabis Operator Challenges California State Statute and Regulations Requiring Labor Peace Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
9
2012
The Year In Review Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
11
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Backs Broad Interpretation of the “Ministerial Exception,” Shielding Religious Employers From Employment Discrimination Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
8
2022
Split of Authority Emerges Regarding Whether Employers Can Dismiss PAGA Lawsuits on Manageability Grounds Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2022
Supreme Court Saves Hospitals from $1.6B Cut to 340B Program Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
28
2023
Federal Judge Upholds California’s Small-business Lending Disclosures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
9
2024
Mother May I? Florida and Utah Recently Passed Regulations for Minor Use of Social Media Platforms Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2017
Spokeo—Round 3: The Ninth Circuit Finds Alleged Statutory Violation Sufficiently “Concrete” To Satisfy Article III Standing Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
19
2019
Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeals Rule on Freedom of Religion Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
1
2022
Supreme Court Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Overturns 50 Years of Precedent on Abortion Laws and Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
12
2022
An Update on the Federal and State Erosion or Protection of Abortion Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2023
Takeaways from the Hermès Litigation over MetaBirkins NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
16
2023
Access to Abortion Pill in Limbo: Navigating the Intricacies of Conflicting Federal Court Rulings in Texas and Washington State Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
8
2013
IRS Issues Guidance Regarding Tax Treatment of Married Same-Sex Couples Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
11
2013
New Jersey Voters Approve Increase to State’s Minimum Wage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2014
Trails-to-Rails-to-?: The Brandt Case and its Potential Impact on the Nation’s Trails Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2019
Update to Texas v. United States: DOJ Files a Brief in Support of Eliminating the ACA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
10
2011
Another California Court of Appeal Finds California's Special Protections for Labor Picketing to be Unconstitutional Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins