May 23, 2012

Extension of 100% Gain Exclusion for Qualified Small Business Stock

Included in the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 signed into law on December 17, 2010, a tax incentive relating to qualified small business stock ("QSBS") was extended for another twelve months.  Pursuant to this extension, noncorporate taxpayers are allowed to exclude all (100%) of their gain from the sale or exchange of  QSBS (subject to  a variety of special rules), provided that the stock is acquired after September 27, 2010 and before January 1, 2012.  The gain exclusion provision only applies to QSBS held for more than five years.  The amount of gain from the sale of QSBS that can be excluded by a taxpayer is generally limited to the greater of $10,000,000 (in the aggregate) or 10 times the tax basis of the QSBS sold.  Generally speaking, and with a few exceptions, QSBS must be acquired when it is issued in exchange for money, property (other than stock) or services.

Also, to qualify as QSBS the stock must be stock in a corporation that: 

  1. for substantially all the time that the stock is held is not a mutual fund or other special type of corporation;
     
  2. at the time the stock is issued and for substantially all the time that the stock is held, is a U.S. corporation and is not an S corporation;
     
  3. at all times after Aug. 10, 1993, and before the issuance of the stock, has gross assets that don't exceed $50,000,000 (taking into account predecessor and affiliated corporations);
     
  4. immediately after the stock is issued, has gross assets that don't exceed $50,000,000 (taking into account affiliated corporations);
     
  5. for substantially all the time that the stock is held, uses—taking into account subsidiary corporations—more than 80% of its assets in the active conduct of a trade or business. Some types of businesses (like farming), even if actively conducted, don't count toward satisfaction of this 80% “active business” test, and some investments in real estate, stocks or securities can cause an otherwise qualifying corporation to fail the 80% test.

There are special rules relating to the calculation of the gain that can be excluded.  For example, if appreciated property is contributed in exchange for QSBS, the "built-in gain" that existed in such property at the time of the contribution may not be excluded from income (and therefore would be subject to tax at normal tax rates) when the QSBS is ultimately sold.

Importantly, this special rule also applies for alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes. 

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Sheppard Mullin's securities and corporate finance practice includes a seasoned team of securities attorneys who represent a wide range of public companies and investment bankers. Our attorneys have significant experience in all areas of regulatory compliance and disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and capital formation under the Securities Act of 1933. We advise on corporate governance issues and have extensive experience advising boards, audit committees, compensation committees and nominating and governance committees of public companies. Our securities practice also...

202-469-4941.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.