Advertisement

July 22, 2014

Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Syndicate content

The National Law Review is a no log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice and alternative dispute resolution. Legal topics addressed include:

Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

 

Title Organization Date Postedsort icon
SawStop Dismissal Explained: Opinion Crosscutting SawStop’s Antitrust Lawsuit Released Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 7/22/2014
Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Indemnification Slight of Hand Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/22/2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
Cal-OSHA Turns Down the Heat - Occupational Safety and Health Administration Jackson Lewis P.C. 7/22/2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00353 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
What Trademark Filing Trends Reveal About Expected Brand Growth – and What it Means for Your Global Brand Protection Strategy Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/22/2014
A Primer: Economic Loss Doctrine Not Necessarily Bar to Tort Recovery Sherin and Lodgen LLP 7/22/2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/22/2014
Child Custody Transfers-When Does the Statutory Parental Presumption Apply? Gilbert LLP 7/22/2014
What Are Your Company’s Wage & Hour Risks? [VIDEO] Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Decides Not to Risk Its D.R. Horton Decision Barnes & Thornburg LLP 7/22/2014
California Dividend Statutes Found To Preempt Common Law Claims Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP 7/22/2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, Decision Granting Additional Discovery IPR2014-00097, 98 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Not To Institute IPR2014-00317 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/21/2014
Iron Dome LLC v. E-Watch, Inc., Expunging Unauthorized Motion to Exclude and Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2014-00439 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/21/2014
Supreme Court Caps the EPA’s Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stationary Sources: Only When a Permit is Required Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/21/2014
Texas Federal Court Dismisses FCA (False Claims Act) Claims As Insufficiently Pled Proskauer Rose LLP 7/21/2014
Fifth Circuit Confirms Employer’s Right To Set Workweek For Payroll Purposes Jackson Lewis P.C. 7/21/2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale 7/21/2014
Insurer’s Poorly Drafted Language Applied As Written; Insured Can’t Complain When New York Law is Applied After It Chose to Reject Missouri Tax Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP 7/21/2014
NLRB Declines to Appeal Class Action Waivers to Supreme Court: What Does it Mean for Employers? Barnes & Thornburg LLP 7/21/2014
DC Circuit Calls for More Transparency in CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) Process Covington & Burling LLP 7/21/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/21/2014
Sixth Circuit Blurs Line Between Primary and Excess Insurance Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/21/2014
EEOC Issues Updated Pregnancy Discrimination Guidance Steptoe & Johnson PLLC 7/21/2014
Taking Care of Our Caretakers U.S. Department of Labor 7/20/2014
District Court Clarifies Statute of Repose Timeline in Material Misstatement Case Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 7/20/2014
Update On CFIUS Developments: Perspectives On the U.S. Court of Appeals Decision In Ralls - Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Covington & Burling LLP 7/19/2014
Shedding Light on CFIUS: Appeals Court Holds That CFIUS Review Lacks Constitutional Due Process - Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/18/2014
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Seeks Comment on ICE Clear Europe Portfolio Margining Proposal Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 7/18/2014
California Supreme Court Considers Component Parts Doctrine Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 7/18/2014
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Final Written Decision (FWD) Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Proposes Changes to Assessments Rule Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 7/18/2014
Northern District of California Court Pares Down Price Discrimination Suit Against Chrysler McDermott Will & Emery 7/18/2014
Appeals Court Holds That the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) Review Lacks Constitutional Due Process Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/18/2014
Ninth Circuit Defines Vicarious Liability Standard Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 7/18/2014
New Massachusetts Law Targets Self-Referrals of Clinical Laboratory Services Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 7/18/2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Corporations and Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: Does the Supreme Court's Decision in Riley v. California Signal the Rebirth of the 4th Amendment in White Collar Cases Barnes & Thornburg LLP 7/18/2014
Naughty Dog, Inc. v. McRO, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Collective and Class Actions: Interns, Assistant Managers-- and Their Lawyers! Barnes & Thornburg LLP 7/18/2014
… The More They Stay the Same Re: Attorney-Client Privilege Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 7/18/2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. RPost Communications Ltd. – PTAB Finds Electronic Messaging a “Technological Invention” Outside Ambit of Covered Business Method Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. 7/18/2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/18/2014
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Invalidates PUC Review of Local Natural Gas Regulation - Public Utility Commission Greenberg Traurig, LLP 7/18/2014
Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc. — Data Structures Per Se Not Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. 7/18/2014
North Carolina Supreme Court Reminds Court of Appeals That Typical Lender-Borrower Relationship is Not a Fiduciary One Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC 7/18/2014

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.