Advertisement

July 24, 2014

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Syndicate content

The National Law Review is a free resource of intellectual property articles addressing laws governing patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, counterfeiting, and grey marketing. Legal topics include : trademark and trade dress infringement, copyright registration and infringement, counterfeit and infringing goods, patent litigation, intellectual property licensing, the Internet, e-mail and document and data retention policies. Details on intellectual property transactions and litigation including actions by the Federal Trade Commission “FTC” , the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and by other governmental agencies as well as civil actions are added daily.

Title Organization Date Postedsort icon
FDA Accepts the First Biosimilar Application under the BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/24/2014
Trending Information: The Connection Between Data Brokers and the Fashion Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/24/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 24, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/24/2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 5 of a 10-Part Series: Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP 7/24/2014
Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00115 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/23/2014
ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00180 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/23/2014
Sequenom, Inc. v. The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00337 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/23/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 23, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/23/2014
Emerging Markets: Opportunity, Risk, and What it Means for Brand Protection [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/22/2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing for Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00252 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
Symantec Corporation v. RPost Communications Limited, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00353 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
What Trademark Filing Trends Reveal About Expected Brand Growth – and What it Means for Your Global Brand Protection Strategy Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/22/2014
Google Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. v. CreateAds LLC, Decision Regarding Standard for Claim Construction IPR2014-00200 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/22/2014
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated, Decision Granting Additional Discovery IPR2014-00097, 98 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/22/2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Not To Institute IPR2014-00317 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/21/2014
Iron Dome LLC v. E-Watch, Inc., Expunging Unauthorized Motion to Exclude and Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2014-00439 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/21/2014
Advantages of Filing More Than One IPR (Inter Partes Review) Against A Single Patent Armstrong Teasdale 7/21/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/21/2014
Nuvasive, Inc. v. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Final Written Decision (FWD) Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Derivation Proceedings: What You Need to Know [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/18/2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Naughty Dog, Inc. v. McRO, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. v. RPost Communications Ltd. – PTAB Finds Electronic Messaging a “Technological Invention” Outside Ambit of Covered Business Method Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. 7/18/2014
Toshiba Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/18/2014
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
Digitech Image Technologies, LLC v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc. — Data Structures Per Se Not Patentable Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. 7/18/2014
Netflix, Inc. v. OpenTV, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing on Decision on Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/18/2014
VMware, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, Order Regarding Non-Compliant Petition Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/17/2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Granting Motion for Additional Briefing on Alice v. CLS Bank Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/17/2014
Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V., Denying Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision (FWD) Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/17/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 17, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/17/2014
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America v. Optical Devices, LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/17/2014
SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc., Denying Motion for Additional Discovery Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/17/2014
Harmonic, Inc. v. Avid Technology, Inc., Final Written Decision Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/16/2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/16/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/16/2014
Examining Trends in Worldwide Design Intellectual Property Filings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/16/2014
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Decision Denying Institution Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/16/2014
Enzymotec Ltd. v. Neptune Technologies & Bioresources, Inc., Decision Granting Petitioner’s Motion For Joinder Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP 7/16/2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 4 of a 10-Part Series: Russia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP 7/16/2014
Conan Doyle’s Quixotic Attempt to Protect Sherlock Holmes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/16/2014
Aftermath of the Supreme Court Ruling Regarding Patent-Ineligible Abstract Ideas in Alice v. CLS Bank Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC 7/15/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 15, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/15/2014
VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com: Federal Circuit Reverses District Court and Requires a Stay Pending a Patent Office Review of a Covered Business Method Patent Andrews Kurth 7/14/2014
International Safe Harbor Privacy Compliance: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 7/14/2014
Seventh Circuit Rules on Trade Mark Abandonment Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 7/14/2014
Todd Dickinson Resigns as Executive Director of AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. 7/14/2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 14, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. 7/14/2014

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.