March 4, 2015

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Syndicate content

The National Law Review is a free resource of intellectual property articles addressing laws governing patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, counterfeiting, and grey marketing. Legal topics include : trademark and trade dress infringement, copyright registration and infringement, counterfeit and infringing goods, patent litigation, intellectual property licensing, the Internet, e-mail and document and data retention policies. Details on intellectual property transactions and litigation including actions by the Federal Trade Commission “FTC” , the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and by other governmental agencies as well as civil actions are added daily.

Date Title Organization
3
Mar
Google Remains on the Hook After Summary Judgment Denied re: Patent Infringement Proskauer Rose LLP
3
Mar
Institution of IPRs is Insufficient Basis to Reconsider a Preliminary Injunction: Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
3
Mar
Haliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Dynamic 3D Geosolutions LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-01186 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
3
Mar
Patent Eligibility Under Alice: Reliance on Lack of Routine or Conventional Use Foley & Lardner LLP
3
Mar
Details Of The European Commission’s Legal Analysis Of ‘Reverse Patent Settlement Agreements’ Revealed Covington & Burling LLP
3
Mar
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 3, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
3
Mar
Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01170 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
2
Mar
Cariou v. Prince: A Controversial Redefining of the Distinction between Parody and Satire Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
2
Mar
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 2, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
2
Mar
Federal Circuit Upholds Patent Term Adjustment Deduction For IDS Filed After Restriction Requirement Foley & Lardner LLP
2
Mar
Expert Witness Testimony Normally Improper for Preliminary Response McDermott Will & Emery
2
Mar
European Trade Secrets Directive Looks to Unify and Strengthen Protection of Proprietary Business Information in the EU Foley & Lardner LLP
1
Mar
Would Have Been Obvious to Combine Prior Art that Mentions an Object with Standard Textbook that Describes that Object McDermott Will & Emery
1
Mar
Petitioners Cannot Respond to Substantive Issue Raised in Preliminary Response McDermott Will & Emery
1
Mar
New Tool to Fight Counterfeiting – Customs Recordation Now Available in Canada Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
1
Mar
Failure to Name All Real Parties in Interest May Cause Termination of a Proceeding After Institution McDermott Will & Emery
1
Mar
A Second Look At The Innovation Act Obviousness Type Double Patenting Statute Foley & Lardner LLP
1
Mar
Claims Can Be Amended in IPR – Really! Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
28
Feb
Protegrity’s “Bare Bones” Allegations Result in Dismissal, Again Proskauer Rose LLP
28
Feb
No Early Peek of Cross-Examination Documents TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. v. Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery

Advertisement

LATEST LEGAL NEWS & ANALYSIS

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
McDermott Will & Emery

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Upcoming Legal Education Events

Thursday, March 5, 2015
Thursday, April 9, 2015
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Tuesday, April 14, 2015