July 6, 2015

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Syndicate content

The National Law Review is a free resource of intellectual property articles addressing laws governing patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, counterfeiting, and grey marketing. Legal topics include : trademark and trade dress infringement, copyright registration and infringement, counterfeit and infringing goods, patent litigation, intellectual property licensing, the Internet, e-mail and document and data retention policies. Details on intellectual property transactions and litigation including actions by the Federal Trade Commission “FTC” , the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and by other governmental agencies as well as civil actions are added daily.

Date Title Organization
6
Jul
Alabama Amends Non-Compete Statute Jackson Lewis P.C.
6
Jul
ITC Sheds Light on Economic Prong of Domestic Industry Under Subsection 337(a)(3)(C) and Issues General Exclusion Order Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
6
Jul
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 6, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
6
Jul
Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, Honda, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo v. Cruise Control Technologies: Final Written Decision Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
6
Jul
Epicor Software Corporation v. Protegrity Corporation: Denying Motion to Consolidate Trials Based Upon Difference in Grounds CBM2015-00006 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
6
Jul
Decision to Expand Panels Resides with PTAB, Not Parties: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. Procter & Gamble McDermott Will & Emery
5
Jul
FieldComm Group v. Sipco, LLC: Decision Denying Institution Based Upon Failure to Show Disclosure of Each Element IPR2015-00663 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
5
Jul
Microsoft Corporation v. Biscotti Inc.: Decision Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-01457 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
5
Jul
Substantially the Same Prior Art - Square Inc. v. Protegrity Corp.; Actifio Inc. v. Delphix Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
5
Jul
Apple, Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.: Denying Institution Where Declaration and Exhibits Lacked Specificity By Including Information for Multiple Petitions IPR2015-00356 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
4
Jul
International Business Machines Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC: Submission of Supplemental Evidence in an IPR May Be Submitted After the Due Date McDermott Will & Emery
3
Jul
New Amendments to USPTO Post-Grant Regulations McDermott Will & Emery
3
Jul
Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp. - PTAB Issues Dissent for Requested Adverse Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
3
Jul
CBM that Recites Scanning Receipts, Encrypting the Data and Transmitting Not Patent-Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
3
Jul
Google Inc. et al. v. Priceplay.com, Inc.: CBM Review Threshold Met by the Intrinsic Record McDermott Will & Emery
3
Jul
Immoral Marks: German OHIM allows “DIE WANDERHURE” Despite its Potential Juicy Meaning Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
2
Jul
IPR Institution Can Be Denied Based on Petition Length or Failure to Identify Related Matters Armstrong Teasdale
2
Jul
Beware the Quagmire of Personal Jurisdiction: Presby Patent Trust v. Infiltrator Systems Proskauer Rose LLP
2
Jul
Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot Program: Intellectual Property McDermott Will & Emery
2
Jul
District Courts Have No Jurisdiction to Review PTAB Decision for Interferences Declared after September 15, 2012 - Biogen MA, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research McDermott Will & Emery

Advertisement

LATEST LEGAL NEWS & ANALYSIS

Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered
Holland & Hart LLP
Jackson Lewis P.C.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS