May 30, 2015

Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Syndicate content

The National Law Review is a free resource of intellectual property articles addressing laws governing patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, false advertising, unfair competition, counterfeiting, and grey marketing. Legal topics include : trademark and trade dress infringement, copyright registration and infringement, counterfeit and infringing goods, patent litigation, intellectual property licensing, the Internet, e-mail and document and data retention policies. Details on intellectual property transactions and litigation including actions by the Federal Trade Commission “FTC” , the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and by other governmental agencies as well as civil actions are added daily.

Date Title Organization
30
May
Changes in Russian Trademark Law Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
29
May
Claim Construction OK; but Still No Summary Judgment Where Material Facts Remain in Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Implementation of Teva’s Hybrid Review Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
No Substantial Change in Standard for Indefiniteness Under “Reasonable Certainty” Test McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Allvoice Decision Provides Roadmap For Software-based Inventions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
29
May
Info-Hold Cases: De Novo Review Where Claim Construction Evidence Is Neither Intrinsic Nor Extrinsic and Expert Damages Testimony Unnecessary for Damages McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
No Competitive Injury Without Intent and Action to Enter the Market re: False Marking Statute McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Quantify Versus Quality Determines Domestic Industry: Lelo Inc. v. International Trade Commission McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Biodelivery Sciences International v. Monosol RX: Denying Institution Because of Insufficient Explanation of Why POSITA Would Have Found the Invention Obvious IPR2015-00167 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
29
May
Divided Commission Upholds ALJ’s Default Sanction and Attorney Fee Award Against Respondent and its Law Firm McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
An Abstract Idea by Any Other Name - Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp., Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
ID on Infringement and Public Interest in Remand of InterDigital Investigation McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
A Sucking Sound on Domain Names: .SUCKS is Open for Registration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
29
May
Federal Circuit Vacates Panel Decision on Disparaging Trademark and Orders En Banc Hearing McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Technological Invention Exception Key to Foiling CBM McDermott Will & Emery
29
May
Ericsson v. Intellectual Ventures I: Publication Date on an IEEE Publication Found to Meet Exception to Hearsay Rule in Final Written Decision for IPR2014-00527 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
28
May
Good Faith Belief in Invalidity No Defense to Active Inducement McDermott Will & Emery
28
May
What Are the Basics of the Patent Process? P.1 McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
28
May
Hyundai Mobis and Mobis Alabama v. Autoliv ASP: Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01005 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
28
May
Litigants Challenging PTO Decisions in District Court Should Be Prepared to Pay PTO’s Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery

Advertisement

LATEST LEGAL NEWS & ANALYSIS

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Foley & Lardner LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Upcoming Legal Education Events