July 25, 2014

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Proposal to Require Natural Gas Quarterly Reporting Still Has Legs

In a move that took many in the industry by surprise, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on July 9, 2013, issued a “Notice of Data Requests to Certain Natural Gas Marketers for Information Related to Natural Gas Sales” in Docket No. RM13-1-000. Last November in this docket, FERC solicited comments on its proposal to require quarterly reporting of every jurisdictional natural gas transaction that entails physical delivery for the next day or for the next month. Quarterly reporting of all jurisdictional electric market contracts and transactions effectuated thereunder long has been the norm. The vast majority of commenters objected to the proposal, with many explaining that the requirement would not advance FERC’s goal of improving natural gas market transparency because jurisdictional transactions make up only a small portion of relevant sales.

Instead of abandoning the proposal as expected, FERC now seeks more information to help it assess whether the proposed reporting requirement would improve transparency. The Notice explains that FERC’s Office of Enforcement will send data requests to “certain natural gas marketers” in order to gather “additional information about what portion of the total natural gas sales are jurisdictional natural gas sales.”

Marketers that receive the five-question data request must respond directly to FERC staff within 15 days. Although marketers can seek confidential treatment of the data they provide in response, if FERC takes further action in the docket it may disclose information “in some summary or aggregated form.”

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.