Advertisement

April 18, 2014

Lessons Learned from the Lululemon Recall

Lululemon’s Chief Product Officer, Sheree Waterson, recently announced she would be stepping down following the fallout from the yoga apparel company’s recall of some of its unintentionally see-through yoga pants. The popular piece of workout clothing makes up about 17% of all women’s yoga pants sold in Lululemon stores, and the company noted that the recall would “significantly hurt its financial results.” From the financial hit on earnings to the reputational damage to the brand to the forced departure of Sheree Waterson, Lululemon’s voluntary recall highlights the importance of thinking through and planning for potential risks, which means having a strategy in place for product recalls.

In the event of a recall situation for a popular product, it is important for companies to consider not just the day of the recall, but anticipate the processes and communications in the weeks following. Companies must have a complete plan of action for ensuring that the recall is effectively communicated to distributors and customers, the product is removed from shelves, and the potential varying ramifications—in this case, the decrease in quarterly sales for Lululemon and the exit of a top executive—from a voluntary recall are considered in the action plan.

As we’ve seen in recent news, it’s not an “if” but “when” a company faces a recall, and so being prepared for the outcome is imperative. Even in a voluntary recall, the fallout that could occur is unclear and can be damaging. The best way to navigate a voluntary product recall is to ensure that there is not only a process in place for the immediate actions, but also that there is a full plan to better alleviate and potentially avoid the multiple risks that might stem from it.

Lululemon’s recall highlights how proper preparation must address various scenarios and risks in order to avoid having a recall spiral out of control. In today’s market with global supply chains, companies face increasing uncertainties that make developing a recall management plan an even more pressing issue. It is critical to not wait for a crisis to strike before developing a plan for such events, and instead build a plan now in order to best mitigate a product crisis.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2014 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If