May 24, 2012

Pentagon Balks on Report About Rare Earth Metal Reliance on China

Rare earth metals, a variety of elements that are difficult and costly to extract, are vital for technology and the military. Tiny amounts of the metals and alloys are used in a plethora of everyday devices, like cell phones, computer memory, and fluorescent lighting. But they are also vital components in many weapon systems, laser devices and telescopes.

The United States used to be the top producer in the rare earth industry, but it is now almost entirely dependent on Chinese exports, which have been increasingly reduced.

Last July, China announced that it would reduce rare earth exports by 72 percent, and during a maritime dispute with Japan, temporarily cut all rare earth exports to its neighbor. In addition, China’s growing domestic demand for rare earth minerals, which could outpace the country’s production between 2012 and 2014, potentially cutting into exports.

“Lawmakers are not just concerned about relying on China, or that China is cutting back access, but the fact that the United States has lost its domestic capacity to produce strategic and critical materials and that the manufacturing supply chain for rare earths has largely migrated to outside the United States,” a report by the Congressional Research Service said.

Congress has requested an assessment by the Pentagon to analyze supply chain issues and vulnerabilities of rare earth metals, necessary for many DOD weapon and technology systems. The report is long overdue and the Pentagon has not indicated if or when it plans on releasing it, CRS said. Congressional action largely hinges on these findings.

Policymakers are concerned about the U.S. dependence on China for the material, which could have serious implications for national security efforts and the technology industry.

“Clearly, rare earth supply limitations present a serious vulnerability to our national security. Yet early indications are the DOD has dismissed the severity of the situation to date,” said a January letter signed by Sens. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) as well as Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo).

The United States has only one rare earth mine production facility, Molycorp, which is restarting production in Mountain Pass, Calif. The facility will open in 2012, and at full capacity, the mine will be able to mine and separate rare earth elements, but not be immediately able to refine rare earth oxides into metals. Last year, the Government Accountability Office reported that rebuilding the U.S. rare earth supply chain could take up to 15 years, and is dependent on acquiring patents currently held by international companies.

FAST FACT: China, which produces 97 percent of rare earth oxides, is the only exporter of refined earth metals and is the top producer of the two strongest magnets, samarium cobalt and neodymium iron boron. The United States currently produces approximately 3 percent of rare earth oxides.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

NATIONAL SECURITY

  • The Transportation Security Administration recently implemented a behavior detection program at airports to screen passengers who might pose a security threat. But there is still a lack of scientific consensus as to whether these detection techniques are reliable for counter terrorism efforts. Furthermore, individuals allegedly involved in six terrorist plots were able to pass through the passenger observation screening. (GAO)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.