May 24, 2012

Settlement Counsel: Is It Right for Your Business?

If your business plan for the upcoming year includes increasing your litigation budget, read no further. If, however, you are looking for more effective ways to spend your litigation dollars, then hiring settlement counsel may be worth considering.

Consider the Alternatives

These days, there are many alternatives to traditional litigation, including judicial settlement conferences, mediation and arbitration. Another option that has been talked about for years but seldom used is adding a settlement lawyer who is experienced in litigation to your dispute resolution team right from the start. The sole purpose of a settlement lawyer is, as the name implies, to try to settle the case. Given the economic downtown that continues to affect all of us, businesses would be wise to consider hiring settlement counsel as a way to reduce litigation costs over the long term.

Some of you may be wondering how it is possible to reduce legal fees by engaging a second lawyer solely devoted to settling your case. Or, why your trial attorney can't just settle the case alone.

By settling your case earlier in the process (even with two lawyers), you will automatically reduce your litigation fees and related expenses. In particular, you will limit discovery and trial costs while accomplishing what would likely happen anyway, given that well over 95% of all cases settle before trial. Most cases, however, settle only after the bulk of legal fees and expenses have already been incurred.

The question that should be asked in each particular case is whether the captain who leads the troops into battle should also serve as the lead negotiator at the peace talks. Think of settlement counsel as your diplomat for peace throughout the life of your dispute (if that is your business, economic or personal goal). To be sure, it is not that one lawyer is incapable of settling your case. We all know that is possible. Rather, in a particular case, trial counsel may be more efficient and effective when focused solely on litigation/trial strategy, while settlement counsel works to maximize your chances of settlement (thus reducing your business risk to zero) by focusing exclusively on settlement.

A Dual-Track Approach

Practically speaking, settlement counsel works hand-in-hand with litigation/trial counsel, becoming fully versed in the important issues of the case, as well as the information that might be necessary to settle. This team also collaborates closely to manage the litigation/settlement budget.

Settling cases takes patience, a laser-like focus, an understanding of business and human psychology, excellent negotiating skills, and above all, perseverance. Positioning a case for settlement, establishing the structure for successful negotiations and credibly communicating with opposing counsel can (in certain cases) be more difficult when the same lawyer is also taking the deposition of the opposing party's CEO or preparing a motion to compel.

Is this dual-track approach right for every case? No. Should your business consider its potential applicability to a particular case? Absolutely. If you would like to learn more about the role of settlement counsel and the alternative fee opportunities relating to it, please contact your Much Shelist attorney or call me directly.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Edward D. Shapiro focuses his practice on the efficient prevention, management and resolution of disputes for commercial entities, organizations and individuals. Serving as Chair of the firm's Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice group, Ed advises and represents clients in state and federal court, before administrative agencies, and in mediation and arbitration in a full range of business matters.

312-521-2421

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.