Evan Flaschen is the chair of the Financial Restructuring Group at Bracewell & Giuliani LLP. His practice includes representation of many of the world's largest institutional investors, hedge funds, Wall Street proprietary desks, fund managers, leveraged finance participants and financial services companies in out-of-court restructurings, in-court proceedings and distressed M&A transactions, both domestically and internationally.
Mr. Flaschen has represented noteholder and bondholder groups, first and second lien lender groups, official creditors' committees or bank agents and syndicates in numerous high profile U.S. and international restructurings, including Washington Mutual Bank TOUSA, Centro Properties, Cemex S.A.B., American Media, BearingPoint, Australian Educational Trust, Parmalat, U.S. Shipping Partners, Abitibi, DURA Automotive, Tembec Industries, Scotia Pacific, Pliant, Remy International, Interstate Bakeries, Sons of Gwalia, Intermet, Star Gas, Kaiser Aluminum, NRG Energy, Liberty Electric, AT&T Canada, Asia Global Crossing, Loewen Group, Boston Chicken, Telex Chile, Burns Philp, Pasminco, Global TeleSystems, Metromedia Fiber, Teleglobe, Consumers Packaging, Chilesat, Henry Walker Eltin, and Western Metals.
Mr. Flaschen has also served as lead counsel, special international counsel or "foreign representative" (a role he pioneered) for a number of multinational Chapter 11 debtors, including Owens Corning, Polaroid, Nextel International, Comdisco, Montgomery Ward, Singer Sewing and Exodus Communications. Mr. Flaschen has appeared in courts in four continents and has published over 85 articles and book chapters in several different countries on workout, restructuring and international insolvency topics.
Quickly locate thousands of legal articles drafted by experienced attorneys and other professionals. The National Law Review's Advanced Search function helps you easily locate legal analysis in specific legal specialties or jurisdictions.
You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.
Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional. NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us.
Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.
