Advertisement

July 24, 2014

2012's Record Healthcare Fraud Recovery Calls for Compliance

To date in 2012, the Department of Justice secured a record $3.3 billion in settlements and judgments in civil cases alleging healthcare fraud against the government under the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”).  The figure, announced just last week, should alarm the healthcare industry, as it underscores the government’s increasing efforts to use the FCA to recover alleged fraudulent payments, prevent fraud and to hold individuals and entities accountable.

Healthcare fraud and abuse compliance is extremely important for the entire healthcare industry, including providers and suppliers.  Hospitals, health systems, nursing homes, physicians, chiropractors, pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, and other healthcare entities should consider reviewing their healthcare compliance plans to ensure that they are integral parts of the organizations' culture.

The FCA's whistleblower, or qui tam, provisions allow private citizens to file suits alleging false claims on behalf of the government.  If the government prevails in the action, then the whistleblower (known as the relator) can receive up to 30 percent of the recovery.  Whistleblowers can be disgruntled former or current employees, vendors, or competitors.

In the past year, the government recovered nearly $2 billion in cases alleging false claims for drugs and medical devices under federally insured health programs, and also returned $745 million to state Medicaid programs.  These cases include recoveries from GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Merck, Sharp & Dohme, two of the three top settlements in 2012.  These recoveries do not include a $561 million False Claims Act settlement with Abbott Laboratories, Inc., part of a $1.5 billion global resolution.

The way to avoid, mitigate and/or manage the risk of an enforcement action is to implement and maintain an effective compliance program that includes the following:  

  • Appointing  a corporate compliance officer a compliance committee;
  • Developing and communicating a code of conduct;
  • Implementing written policies and procedures allowing for compliance with federal health care requirements;
  • Providing  compliance program training that covers  policies and procedures pertaining to anti-kickback laws and legal sanctions under the anti-kickback statute;
  • Bringing contractual arrangements in compliance with the anti-kickback statute;
  • Auditing of business relationships and contractual arrangements; 
  • Establishing a confidential disclosure program that develops a mechanism (e.g. toll free hotline) to allow individuals to report or disclose issues, potential offenses, and questions as well as institute a policy of non-retaliation; 
  • Enforcing standards through disciplinary guidelines for employees of all levels as well as responding to detected offenses and developing corrective actions;
  • Reviewing the effectiveness and budget for compliance plans; and,
  • Reporting compliance activities directly to the governing board and top management 
© Copyright 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Diane Keefe, Health Care, Attorney, Armstrong Teasdale, Law Firm
Of Counsel

Diane J. Keefe, a member of Armstrong Teasdale’s health care practice group, maintains a general transactional and regulatory practice.

Working primarily with hospitals, physicians, physician groups and other health care providers and suppliers, Diane advises clients on a variety of complex legal problems from compliance and business transactions to operational and management issues. She handles concerns relating to the overall operation of health care organizations including the development of hospital and nursing home policies and procedures; Stark, anti-kickback, Medicare/...

314-259-4731

About the Author

Robert Schwendinger, Health Care Attorney, Armstrong Teasdale Law firm
Partner

As leader of the Health Care practice group, Bob Schwendinger provides strategic advice and legal representation for hospitals, physician groups, providers and both for-profit and nonprofit corporations. Often he acts as outside general counsel, guiding the legal compliance efforts of an organization.

For a broad range of health care providers, Bob advises regarding fraud and abuse and regulatory and compliance issues. He regularly counsels providers in federal and state investigations and self-disclosures pertaining to the False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback, Stark Law and quality of...

314-342-8075
Diane E. Felix, health care attorney, Armstrong Teasdale, law firm
Partner

Diane Felix has focused her practice on representation of health care providers, with a significant portion of that practice involving long-term care facilities. Her representation of providers has included Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement matters, licensure and certification issues, Certificate of Need matters, preparation and negotiation of contracts, (including admission agreements, professional services agreements, leases and purchase agreements) and operational questions (involving issues such as consent to treatment, confidentiality of records and ADA compliance).

314-342-8001

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.