Advertisement

April 24, 2014

2012 Trends in Securities Class Action Filings

On January 23, Cornerstone Research and Stanford Law School’s Securities Class Action Clearinghouse released their “2012 Year in Review” report, which analyzes the federal securities fraud class action filings over the past year and looks at the number of actions filed, the types of filings, the geographic locations of the filings, and the industries affected. In general, the report notes that fewer class action lawsuits were filed in 2012, fewer filings were made against companies in the Financial Industry, and no new filings were related to the credit crisis.

The number of securities class actions filed in 2012 dropped by 20%. 152 securities class action suits were filed in 2012, fewer than in either 2011 (188 suits) or in an average year from 1977–2011 (193 suits). The report noted that the decrease was “largely due” to the decrease in filings challenging mergers and acquisitions. 85% of the suits brought in 2012 contained Rule 10b-5 claims, the highest percentage in the last five years. The industry most targeted by securities class actions in 2012 was the “Consumer Non-Cyclical” industry, which includes tobacco, beverage, and personal and household products companies, while filings against Financial Industry companies have been decreasing. In fact, 2012 was the first year in which there were no new filings related to the credit crisis.

These securities class action lawsuits continue to be filed predominantly in the Second Circuit and the Ninth Circuit; however, Ninth Circuit filings fell from 55% of total filings in 2011 to 28% of total filings in 2012. 18% more actions were filed against companies listed on the NYSE or Amex, while the number of filings against companies listed on NASDAQ decreased 43%.

Cornerstone Research, “Securities Class Action Filings—2012 Year in Review,” is available at here.

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Michael M. Rosensaft, Health Care Attorney, Katten Muchin Law Firm
Partner

Michael M. Rosensaft focuses his litigation practice on representing individuals and businesses in white collar criminal matters, regulatory enforcement matters, corporate internal investigations, insurance and health care fraud and complex civil litigation.

212-940-6631

About the Author

Allison Wuertz, Securities Litigation Attorney, Katten Muchin Law firm
Associate

Allison Wuertz concentrates her practice in litigation and dispute resolution matters.

212-940-6675

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do no