Advertisement

May 21, 2013

In an Age of New Technology, Be Wary of 'Textual' Harassment

Welcome to 2010 (i.e., "the future"), where you no longer call someone to ask them out on a date -- you text message them using your cell phone, Blackberry, or other mobile device. And, maybe you couldn't quite tell from their response whether they are uninterested or simply playing hard to get, so you text them again. And again. And, maybe that person on the receiving end of your texts is your co-worker or subordinate. Before you know it, you and/or your company get hit with a sexual harassment lawsuit and that co-worker or subordinate is armed with pages of text messages as evidence.

While technology has certainly brought great advances in workplace productivity, it has also brought great advances in workplace slacking, and it has increased the potential for workplace harassment. In this new age of potential harassment claims, managers and business owners would be wise to keep abreast of the latest technologies and how they can impact the workplace. While texting has certainly been with us for a number of years, its use is now clearly widespread. Your employees may be texting at work without you ever knowing it. Maybe they are talking to each other silently via text -- chatting, flirting, and more. Perhaps they are even "sexting" each other (sending text messages containing sexually explicit words and/or photos). The dangers are fairly obvious. Unlike the spoken word, which is accompanied by tone of voice and nonverbal expressions, the written word is much more subject to differing interpretations. One person's innocent flirting may be interpreted by another as harassment, especially if the recipient is a subordinate who fears for his or her job. Moreover, when text messaging is used, there is a transcript that can be recovered. Should litigation arise, it is no longer "he said, she said," it is "let's review the transcript."

While the potential for an extensive document trail has been present for years with e-mail, the use of cell phones for texting is much more difficult to police, especially if the mobile device is owned by the employee and not the company. In addition, employees are likely to treat their texts even more casually than their e-mails, not stopping to think about what they are typing.

Text-heavy lawsuits have been on the rise recently and that trend is likely to continue. In late 2008, a former employee sued World Wrestling Entertainment ("WWE"), alleging that her boss harassed her via late night phone calls and text messages. In April of last year, Central Michigan University settled a sexual harassment case for $450,000 where its women's soccer coach was accused of harassing two players by, among other things, text messaging them.

Of course, texting raises other issues beyond possible harassment claims. Soon, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case of City of Ontario v. Quon, where the plaintiff, Mr. Quon, claims that the City of Ontario, California violated his privacy rights by reviewing transcripts of the texts on his city-issued mobile device, and then firing him due to the sexually explicit nature of certain texts he exchanged with co-workers. The Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of Mr. Quon, based on a lower level supervisor's unofficial policy of not reviewing texts, which the Court found binding on the City. The trial court judge in the case, Stephen G. Larson, aptly summed up the difficult privacy issue facing employers and the courts: "What are the legal boundaries of an employee's privacy in this interconnected, electronic-communication age, one in which thoughts and ideas that would have been spoken personally and privately in ages past are now instantly text-messaged to friends and family via hand-held, computer-assisted electronic devices?"

Hopefully, the Quon case will provide some much-needed guidance on the privacy issue. In any event, it is clear that the trend of technology outpacing expectations of normal workplace communications will continue. Fortunately, when it comes to harassment in the workplace, the solution is more old-fashioned. As with your health and car, preventive maintenance is the key. Update your workplace harassment policies to take into account the potential for harassment via texting, e-mail, instant messaging, etc. Ensure that your supervisors are aware of these issues. And, continue to conduct periodic harassment training for all employees, including training on what not to do with the latest, greatest technology.

*As seen in the January 22nd issue of The State Journal.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Brian J. Moore is a member of the Labor and Employment Department. Brian has extensive experience handling a wide array of labor and employment disputes, including discrimination, sexual harassment, wage and hour, unemployment, unfair labor practice, and union representation cases. He has practiced in various state and federal courts, as well as before the West Virginia Human Rights Commission, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and National Labor Relations Board. In addition, Brian routinely works with Human Resource Managers and in-house counsel preparing and reviewing employee...

(304) 357-9905

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.