July 28, 2014
July 25, 2014
Amendment to Economic Espionage Act
Don’t say Congress can’t get anything done. At the end of the session, they managed to pass Senate Bill 3642 which changes – slightly – the definition of what trade secrets are covered under the Act.
In the Aleynikov case that we reported about over the years, the defendant managed to walk because the trade secrets he stole were not “produced” for use in interstate commerce.
Under the new law, designed to reverse the earlier decision in Aleynikov, trade secrets used in or intended for use in interstate commerce are now included. The produced for requirement is gone.
Now say goodnight to the 112th Congress.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- The SEC Has Discovered Its Whistleblower Program
- SEC Settles Third-Party Insider Trading Claim Against New York Investor Relations Executive
- Agencies Issue Final Rule on the Recovery of Contractor Whistleblower Legal Costs
- Illinois District Court Reaffirms Rule 10b5-1 Standard and Denies Motion to Dismiss Insider Trading Charges
- Governor Quinn Approves Illinois "Ban the Box" Law Limiting Private Employers' Ability to Screen Job Applicants by Criminal History
- Labs & Referring Physicians Take Note of Office of Inspector General (OIG)’s Special Fraud Alert