May 21, 2012

Australia: Sunset for the Sons of Gwalia? Proposed Legislation to Subordinate Shareholder Claims

On April 23, 2010, the Australian Department of the Treasury issued an "Exposure Draft" of proposed legislation to reverse the effects of Sons of Gwalia. The Exposure Draft can be found here and the "Explanatory Memorandum" that accompanies the Exposure Draft can be found here.

In a nutshell, here are the three matters that U.S. investors (whether par or distressed) need to know about the proposed legislation:

  • First, the legislation is clear that all claims in relation to the buying, selling, holding or otherwise dealing with shares are subordinated to all other creditors' claims.
  • Second, shareholders will not be entitled to vote as creditors, which was a major problem in the Sons of Gwalia administration, as discussed in our first Client Update.
  • Third, the legislation will not have "retrospective effect." This means that the legislation will not affect any shareholder damages claims that arose prior to the effective date of the legislation. This is so even with respect to claims that have not yet been asserted, so long as the fraud or misrepresentation giving rise to the claims occurred prior to the effective date.

Under the Australian Parliamentary system, it is likely that the legislation will be enacted by the end of this year. However, the purpose of the Exposure Draft is to solicit comments concerning the legislation, both as to whether it should be enacted and also as to the specific wording and scope of the legislation.

Bracewell & Giuliani was involved in the Sons of Gwalia litigation and, with many others in Australia, we have been lobbying for this legislative reversal. In that same vein, we have provided specific comments to the Australian Treasury emphasizing the importance of the legislation to the U.S. capital markets and providing suggestions as to broadening the scope of the legislation to include other types of securities in addition to common shares. The full text of our comments can be found here.  A g'day indeed!

© 2012 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Evan Flaschen is the chair of the Financial Restructuring Group at Bracewell & Giuliani LLP.  His practice includes representation of many of the world's largest institutional investors, hedge funds, Wall Street proprietary desks, fund managers, leveraged finance participants and financial services companies in out-of-court restructurings, in-court proceedings and distressed M&A transactions, both domestically and internationally.

Mr. Flaschen has represented noteholder and bondholder groups, first and second lien lender...

860-256-8537
Partner

Renée Dailey is a member of Bracewell & Giuliani's Financial Restructuring team. Ms. Dailey's practice focuses on representation of hedge funds and institutional investors in complex out-of-court restructurings and in-court proceedings both in the U.S. and internationally. Ms. Dailey's practice also involves the representation of debtor-in-possession lenders in Chapter 11 cases and strategic purchasers in 363 acquisitions.

860-256-8531

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.