Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Beware of Cell Tower “Lease Optimization”

Cities, churches and other property owners are getting letters from companies running "Lease Optimization Programs" for the major cell phone companies.  They ask for (or in some cases demand) significant changes to their cell tower leases.

In general, say "no" to these requests.  The reason is that the changes are harmful - -  sometimes very harmful - - to the property owner. 

For example, some of the changes we have seen would:

  • Allow the cell phone company to make any changes it wants to its antennas or facilities on the property or buildings without the property owner's permission.  This includes moving the tower to a different part of the property altogether!
  • Give the cell phone company a right of first refusal to buy the property when it is sold – this typically reduces what the property is worth by 10 to 30 percent. 
  • Prevent the property owner from selling the lease to companies that know what they are doing and can get much better lease rent and terms from the cell phone company.

In addition, the changes are so extreme that they may violate the terms of the property owner's mortgage - - or make future refinancing or mortgages impossible.  This can hurt the sale price of the property by making it hard for a buyer to get a mortgage.

Adding insult to injury, any rent increases offered for these changes is minimal.  In fact, often rent reductions are requested based on the claim that the cell phone company has too many towers in the area, and that unless concessions are granted, the cell tower may go away. 

Such claims are generally spurious.  Cell phone companies are telling the Federal government the opposite – namely, that demand for cell phone capacity is exploding; that cell phone towers must double or triple to meet this demand; and the Feds must thus preempt state laws, local laws, and other restrictions which might slow this expansion.

So view requests for lease changes, especially those from "Lease Optimization" companies with skepticism.  If  you're tempted to sign, get professional advice before agreeing.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

John is co-chair of the firm’s Cable and Telecommunications Practice Group. He focuses on representing municipalities nationwide on cable and telecommunications matters including the grant, renewal and transfer of cable franchises, Wi-Fi and Wi-Max (wireless) agreements, telecommunications matters, right of way matters, cellular tower zoning, cell tower leasing and FCC proceedings. He has worked with over 200 communities in 15 states on such matters. He also represents municipal and cooperative utilities and...

616/336-6725

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.