Advertisement

May 22, 2013

California Formalizes Strict Approach to TEA Designation

The newly formed California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Biz) held a conference call today to provide EB-5 stakeholders with an update related to the issuance of Targeted Employment Area (TEA) designations in the state of California.  Specifically, the call was meant to formally announce that California would now provide customized TEA certifications for projects that qualify under the new state guidelines.

Eligible TEAs include metropolitan statistical area, counties, cities, or individual census tracts with qualifying high unemployment. The state has introduced a new web page which will list the qualifying TEA counties, cities, MSAs and census tracts.  The goal of the database is to allow projects to immediately know if they are eligible for a TEA designation, prior to applying for certification from the state.  Projects that do not fall into any of the areas listed on the website will not be eligible to receive a formal certification letter from the state. 

EB-5 projects that received special area designations in previous years may request a renewed certificate if it is for the same investment project, it covers the same subarea, and the then current unemployment data provides a high unemployment rate for the aggregated area.  Likewise, applications that have been submitted and are currently pending will be evaluated under the previous guidelines.  Such requests will be handled on a case-by-case basis and renewed certificates might be issued at the discretion of the state.  While this grandfathering of existing projects is welcome news that will not disrupt pending projects, Brook Taylor, Deputy Director for Communications and Policy for GO-Biz was not able to state how long this policy would be in place for. 

Importantly, the state will no longer allow applicants to link multiple counties, cities or census tracts together to create an area of high unemployment certified by the state, commonly referred to as “gerrymandering.”  Mr.  Taylor noted on the call that aggregating counties, cities, or census tracts are not in line with the state guidelines of the program as the intent of the state is to support projects in areas of high unemployment and to ensure transparency in the TEA designation process.

If a project is not eligible for state certification, it will to apply directly to the USCIS to obtain TEA designation by showing that the project is in fact located in an area of high unemployment.   The designation and certification of TEAs in California is effective from May 1, 2012 through April 30, 2013, when a new certified list will be issued based on calendar year 2012 unemployment data.

Many stakeholders on the call voiced their concerns that implementation of this new policy will prevent many cities in California from being able to attract EB-5 immigrant investor funds, this includes places such as Anaheim, San Francisco, and San Jose .  In response, Taylor noted that it was concerns over expansive interpretations of TEAs by other states notably New York and Florida that prompted California to eliminate the practice of joining census tracts to form TEAs.  Despite California’s concerns, in the January 23, 2012, EB-5 Stakeholder Meeting USCIS officials noted that they will “defer to the state’s TEA designation in terms of the state’s definition of the geographic boundaries of the TEA based upon high unemployment.”

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Kate Kalmykov focuses her practice on business immigration and compliance. She represents clients in a wide-range of employment based immigrant and non-immigrant visa matters including students, trainees, professionals, managers and executives, artists and entertainers, treaty investors and traders, persons of extraordinary ability and immigrant investors.

973.443.3276

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.