May 22, 2012

Changes in Labor Requirements on Public--Including School--Construction Projects

Just before it closed its session, the West Virginia Legislature passed a bill that will impact construction--including that of school buildings and facilities--beginning in June of 2010. The bill, which Governor Manchin signed March 19, 2010, is intended to strengthen the State's efforts to promote the use of local labor on construction projects within the State.

The West Virginia Jobs Act was first passed in 2001 with the intent of employing residents of local labor markets on public improvement projects, funded in whole or in part using taxpayer funding. At the time, the Legislature noted that many counties in West Virginia were designated as labor surplus areas by the United States Department of Labor and that the use of persons from outside local labor markets contributed to the State's higher-than-average unemployment rate.

To remedy this, the West Virginia Jobs Act required employers working on public improvement projects costing $1,000,000 or more to hire at least 75% of their employees from the local labor market. Employers were permitted to hire at least two employees from outside the local labor market, and they could seek an exemption if postings at the nearest office of the bureau of employment programs' division of employment services did not yield sufficient qualified workers. Violation of the Act resulted in a penalty of $100 per day of the violation. Were they not covered by the language of the Act, the School Building Authority's Supplemental, General, and Special Conditions require that all contractors and subcontractors working on SBA-funded projects comply with the Act.

The Legislature's most recent action expands significantly when the Act will apply. The Act now applies to all construction projects of $500,000 or more, instead of $1,000,000. The Act continues to exclude temporary and emergency repairs, but the reduction of the threshold to $500,000 will certainly mean that the Act applies to the vast majority of school construction projects.

The Legislature also clarified and limited the definition of local labor market. The definition previously was somewhat ambiguous and included all counties within West Virginia and "all counties bordering West Virginia that fall within seventy-five miles of the border of West Virginia." The ambiguity regarded counties that do not touch the West Virginia border but some part of which fall within seventy-five miles of the border. The local labor market now includes only those counties within West Virginia and those counties outside West Virginia if any portion of that county is within fifty miles of the West Virginia border.

Though the Act technically imposes requirements on employers and the civil penalties apply to employers who violate the Act, school boards should take note of these changes, as they are nearly always placed in the position of ensuring that employers/contractors comply.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Jacob A. Manning is a member of the Litigation Department. Jacob maintains a diverse litigation practice, and represents a wide variety of parties in civil litigation in state and federal courts in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. He has successfully represented clients before appellate courts in each jurisdiction.

In particular, Jacob focuses a significant portion of his practice on construction law and represents owners—particularly public entities—contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers in litigation as well as during contract negotiations. Jacob...

304-230-1604

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.