Advertisement

July 23, 2014

Coal Companies’ Constitutional Case against Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) Employees Fails

A district court has rejected a lawsuit brought by several Kentucky coal companies to recover damages against MSHA employees following their refusal to allow the operator to recover mining equipment before it was ruined by flooding.

The plaintiffs charged MSHA District Manager Irwin Hooker and at least five other agency employees with devising a “coercive scheme” to shut down Left Fork’s Straight Creek #1 Mine in Bell County, Kentucky. Besides seeking monetary and punitive damages, the companies charged the MSHA employees with trespass, civil conspiracy, abuse of process and intentional interference with a contract.

The lawsuit, filed in January 2013, claimed unlawful search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution and was based on a successful 1971 case brought against federal narcotics agents. The U.S. Supreme Court in 1971 carved out a narrow source of relief, the so-called Bivens remedy, for constitutional violations by federal officials acting in their official capacity.

Left Fork exercised its rights under the Mine Act, but the wheels of justice turned too slowly to save the mine from ruin. The case began with a March-2011 MSHA order over elevated methane levels, which were traced to a missing ventilation curtain. However, the agency also determined seals in the mine were not being properly maintained. The operator was required to draw up a remediation plan for approval by the district manager. Ten months went by as the two sides discussed its contents. Meanwhile, the mine essentially was closed.

The next blow came in January 2012, when government officials issued an order to de-energize power and withdraw miners for the alleged failure to abate violations. Throughout, no mine company employees had been allowed to enter. Loss of power caused the mine to begin to flood. The operator’s request to retrieve the equipment was denied. Left Fork appealed for an expedited proceeding before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, but an administrative law judge’s decision some three months later in favor of the operator came too late.

In the interim, the district manager finally approved the seals remediation plan; however, his approval was restricted to rescue personnel, who were unable to extract the equipment.

The court noted that damages are not available to the plaintiffs under the Mine Act for the flooded mine and loss of equipment. “But none of these facts justify recognition of a new Bivens remedy in the face of the Mine Act’s statutory structure,” the court said. 

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2014

About the Author

Bradford T. Hammock workplace safety law attorney Jackson Lewis law firm
Shareholder

Bradford T. Hammock is a Shareholder in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C.  He focuses his practice in the safety and health area, and is Leader of the firm’s Workplace Safety and Health practice group.

Mr. Hammock’s national practice focuses on all aspects of occupational safety and health law.  In particular, Mr. Hammock provides invaluable assistance to employers in a preventive practice:  (1) conducting full-scale safety and health compliance audits; (2) reviewing and revising corporate safety and health...

(703) 483-8300

About the Author

Mark Savit government investigations attorney at Jackson Lewis Law firm
Shareholder

Mark Savit is a Shareholder in the Denver office of Jackson Lewis. Mr. Savit counsels clients in government investigations, and on regulatory matters, to help limit civil liabilities, prevent criminal prosecutions, and promote sound health, safety and environmental policies. Mr. Savit has expertise in health and safety law, industrial disaster response and environmental law  and related litigation and legislative services. Mr. Savit began his career at the Department of the Interior where he headed the special investigation unit of the Mining Enforcement and Safety Administration....

303) 892-0404

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.