Advertisement

April 17, 2014

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Makes Comparability Determinations for Substituted Compliance Purposes

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has approved comparability determinations for substituted compliance with six different non-US regulatory regimes. Pursuant to the substituted compliance determinations, the CFTC will permit non-US swap dealers (SDs) and non-US major swap participants (MSPs) to comply with regulations in their home jurisdiction in lieu of complying with comparable CFTC regulations.The CFTC has provided a chart (availablehere) summarizing entity-level comparability determinations for Australia, Canada, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan and Switzerland. Except as otherwise indicated in the chart, the substituted compliance determinations provide relief for certain non-US SDs and non-US MSPs from various CFTC entity-level requirements, including CFTC Regulations 3.3 (Chief Compliance Officer), 23.201 (Swap Data Recordkeeping), 23.203 (Swap Data Recordkeeping), 23.600 (Risk Management Program), 23.601 (Monitoring of Position Limits), 23.602 (Diligent Supervision), 23.603 (Business Continuity), 23.605 (Conflicts of Interest), 23.606 (Availability of Information for Disclosure) and 23.609 (Clearing Member Risk Management). 

The CFTC additionally provided transaction-level comparability determinations for the European Union and Japan. For the European Union, the CFTC approved substituted compliance for CFTC Regulations 23.501 (Trade Confirmation), 23.502 (Portfolio Reconciliation and Compression) and 23.503 (Portfolio Compression), as well as parts of CFTC Regulations 23.202 (Daily Trading Records) and 23.504 (Swap Trading Relationship Documentation). For Japan, the CFTC approved substituted compliance for CFTC Regulation 23.202 and parts of CFTC Regulation 23.504. 

All of the CFTC’s comparability determinations are available here

In making the comparability determinations, the CFTC declined to make determinations for CFTC Regulations 23.600(c)(2) (Periodic Risk Exposure Reports) and 23.608 (Restrictions on Counterparty Clearing Relationships) in all jurisdictions, and CFTC Regulation 23.609 (Clearing Member Risk Management) in Hong Kong and Switzerland. Accordingly, the CFTC’s Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight has issued temporary no-action relief from such requirements for non-US SDs and non-US MSPs established in the relevant jurisdictions until March 3, 2014. CFTC Letter No. 13-78 is available here.

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Guy Dempsey Jr., Bank Regulations Attorney, Katten Muchin Law Firm
Partner

Guy C. Dempsey Jr. concentrates his practice on derivatives and structured products and on bank regulation. He advises clients on derivatives transactions of all types across all asset classes, as well as on the corporate governance, regulatory, collateral, compliance, insolvency and litigation issues associated with such products.

212-940-8593

About the Author

James M. Brady, Katten Muchin Law Firm, Finance Attorney
Associate

James Brady concentrates his practice in financial services matters.

312-902-5362

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.