May 23, 2012

EEOC Sues Owner of California McDonald's for Disability Discrimination

Supervisor With Cerebral Palsy Demoted and Forced to Quit Upon Change in Ownership, Federal Agency Charged

FRESNO, Calif. – Alia Corporation, a property management company and owner of a McDonald’s in Oakhurst, Calif., unlawfully demoted a supervisor because of his cerebral palsy and forced him to quit, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a disability discrimination lawsuit it filed today.

Derrick Morgan had worked under a prior owner of the Oakhurst McDonald’s without problems since 2006, according to the EEOC.  In fact, Morgan was promoted from crew member to floor supervisor in 2008 and was generally known to be a good employee.  By January 2009, Alia Corporation – which operates over 20 McDonald’s franchise locations throughout central California – assumed control of the restaurant in Oakhurst.  Within a couple of months, new management demoted Morgan to a janitorial position, cut his hours nearly in half and reduced his hourly wages, the EEOC asserted.  Due to the steep reduction in income, Morgan was forced to quit by June 2009. 

The EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. Alia Corporation d/b/a McDonald’s, Case No. 1:11-cv-01549-AWI-DLB) against the Merced, Calif.-based company in U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of California after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.  The EEOC’s suit argues that Alia Corporation engaged in disability discrimination that violates the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA).  The suit seeks back pay and compensatory and punitive damages on behalf of Morgan along with injunctive relief intended to prevent further instances of discrimination.  

“Employers must let go of their stereotypes and fears about employing people with disabilities,” said Anna Y. Park, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Los Angeles District Office, which includes Fresno in its jurisdiction.  “This is a case where the company illegally stripped a well-qualified worker of his ability to earn a living due to misperceptions about his disability.”

Melissa Barrios, director of the EEOC’s Fresno Local Office, said, “People with disabilities have the same right to work as the rest of us.  In recent years, the laws against disability discrimination have become more flexible to cover most all individuals who suffer bias as a result of a physical or mental condition.”

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.