May 23, 2012

Employers are Reminded Not To Specify Which Documents Should Be Presented For I-9 Purposes

On April 16, 2010, the Justice Department filed a complaint against John Jay College alleging that the college engaged in a pattern and practice of discrimination by requiring all non-U.S. citizens to present certain work authorization documents to the exclusion of other acceptable documents.

Federal law requires all U.S. employers to document that each employee hired after November 6, 1986 (including U.S. citizen employees) has proper employment authorization and that each employee's identity is consistent with the person's employment authorization documents. In order to comply, employers are required to complete an Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 and to require new hires to present either (i) a Form I-9 List A document to establish both employment eligibility and identity; or (ii) separate documents from Form I-9 Lists B and C to establish their employment eligibility and identity respectively.

The complaint filed by the Justice Department alleges that John Jay College imposed different or greater employment eligibility verification standards on non-citizens as compared to U.S. citizens and, in one instance, required that an employee who produced an unrestricted Social Security card and driver's license to also produce her permanent residence card. Federal law prohibits employers, both private and public, from imposing different or greater employment eligibility verification stands on non-citizens as compared to U.S. citizens.

All employers should remember that they may not specify which documents they prefer to see regarding the I-9 process, and as long as the documents presented enable the employer to complete the I-9 form, the employer must accept the documents if they meet the Form I-9 standards.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Gregory P. Adams is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Chair of the Immigration Practice Group. Greg concentrates his practice on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law. He counsels domestic and international businesses, educational institutions, and not-for-profit entities regarding temporary and permanent business-, employment-, and investment-related U.S. visas. He has represented high tech (Route 128/495) clients on immigration cases for two decades, including development of immigration policies and the architecture and procedures for handling large volumes of cases. Greg also...

513-977-8125

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.