May 23, 2012

EPA's Climate Change Requirements Grow: Underground Coal Mines Added to List July 6, 2010

Some underground coal mine operators already saddled with copious amounts of paperwork will soon be required to monitor and report their greenhouse gas emissions. This week, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) signed a rule requiring that four additional source categories track and report greenhouse gas emissions under EPA's earlier GHG reporting rule published October 30, 2009. Underground coal mines were originally excluded from the 41 sources regulated in the 2009 rule, but will now be required to report certain methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrous oxide emissions when the rule becomes effective.

While surface mines, post-mining activities, and abandoned mines are excluded from the rule, underground coal mines classified by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) as active, currently under development, or with active degasification systems will be required to record and report emissions if they are subject to MSHA’s ventilation system sampling program. According to the rule’s technical support document, this rule will affect approximately 114 underground coal mines around the country at an average first year cost of $34,717 per mine. The rule especially targets underground mines with degasification systems; as of 2006, 20 mines had degasification systems in place.

For the 114 mines believed to be covered under this rule, the reporting requirements and monitoring techniques may be demanding. A covered mine must report the following for each ventilation and degasification well or shaft:

  1. Quarterly and net methane liberation from each ventilation well or shaft including methane content, flow data, temperature and pressure readings, and moisture content;
  2. Weekly methane liberation from each degasification system including methane content, flow data, temperature and pressure readings, and moisture content;
  3. Weekly methane destruction from each device, including destruction by sale, use, or onsite flaring;
  4. Quarterly carbon dioxide emissions from methane destruction onsite, excluding flaring; and
  5. Annual carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions from any fuel combustion units onsite.1

The rule treats these monitoring sites quite expansively; degasification systems “include all degasification wells and gob gas vent holes at the underground mine.” In addition, “ventilation well or shaft” encompasses any and all wells and shafts used as an outlet to move air from the system out of the mine. As a result, even a simple borehole used for ventilation or an outlet from a required longwall degasification entry must be monitored.

Covered mines can monitor these emissions in one of two ways; liberated methane can be tracked using continuous emissions monitoring systems (“CEMS”), or through quarterly sampling using MSHA protocols. If the mine chooses to undertake quarterly sampling, it may either rely upon MSHA’s sample results or conduct its own independent sampling. This choice may seem straightforward, but choosing the monitoring system with the least upfront cost and labor may not be the best route. If GHG reporting is compiled for use in a future greenhouse gas regulatory scheme, inaccurate results could put the mine at a significant disadvantage.

Covered mines must start tracking emissions on January 1, 2011, and report the results to the EPA by March 31, 2012. Since this requirement is less than a year away, underground mine managers should begin now to determine (i) whether the rule applies to its operations, (ii) each emissions monitoring point, (iii) its preferred tracking method, and (iv) its reporting infrastructure. During this process, management should be aware of this rule’s repercussions. The GHG reporting rule is widely viewed as the first step toward implementing GHG emissions limits and related climate change regulation; hence, the results of this reporting may be used to determine a mine’s required emissions reductions or marketable credits. Attorneys in Dinsmore & Shohl's Natural Resources Practice Group have experience in addressing such issues, and may be able to help mine management assess its duties and options under this mandatory rule, with a focus on planning for timely compliance.is whether firms and their clients are willing to develop the processes necessary for the change to succeed.
 


(1) See EPA’s “Underground Coal Mines Monitoring Checklist,” available at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads10/Subpart-FF_checklist.pdf

 

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Heather Blandford is a member of the Litigation Department. Her practice focuses on many aspects of mining and natural resources law, including mine safety and health law, environmental litigation, and transactional work. She has represented clients in proceedings under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, civil litigation, and mineral sale and lease transactions

(304) 225-1434

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.