May 23, 2012

Ernst & Young’s Global Information Security Survey

 

Last week, I attended the Ernst & Young media roundtable to hear the results of its 2010 Global Information Security Survey (GISS). The survey includes responses from participants in 1,598 organizations in 56 countries across all major industries.

With the increase in the use of external service providers and the adoption of new technologies such as cloud computing, social networking and Web 2.0, companies are increasingly exposed to data breach threats. In fact, 60% of respondents perceived an increase in the level of risk they face due to the use of social networking, cloud computing and personal devices in the enterprise. And according to the survey, companies are taking a proactive stance as 46% indicated that their annual investment in information security is increasing. Though IT professionals are trying, not all are succeeding in keeping up with new tech threats.

“I’ve never seen this kind of shift in IT before,” said Jose Granado, the America’s practice leader for information security services within Ernst & Young. “Security professionals are trying to keep up with the pace, but aren’t really doing a great job. The have limited resources and a limited budget.”

A concern for IT professionals is mobile computing. Demands of the mobile workforce are driving changes to the way organizations support and protect the flow of information. In fact, 53% of respondents indicated that increased workforce mobility is a significant or considerable challenge to effectively delivering their information security initiatives. Aside from investing more on data loss prevention technologies, 39% of respondents are making policy adjustments to address the potential new or increased risks.

“You have to implement realistic policies,” said Chip Tsantes, principal within the financial services division of Ernst & Young. “They need to be liveable and workable, or else people will go around them. You can’t simply ban things.”

Another major concern for IT pros is the gaining popularity of cloud computing. Both Granado and Tsantes were shocked to learn that 45% of respondents (primarily those on the non-financial services side) are currently using, evaluating or are planning to use cloud computing services within the next 12 months.

“From the standpoint of a traditional IT security professional, endorsing or supporting a cloud environment is counter-intuitive,” said Granado. “How do I know where my data is and how do I know it is protected?”

So how do companies increase their confidence in cloud computing? According to the survey, 85% say that external certification would increase their trust.

So I asked Granado and Tsantes if they could tell me when they believed there would be a universal set of standards for cloud computing providers. Granado feels there is a two-to-three year timeline in regards to having something solidified. He says businesses are going to drive it; If businesses continue to push, “cloud providers would have to follow.” With more and more sensitive data calling the cloud home, let’s hope Granada is being conservative with his estimate.

cloud computing2

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2012 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Editor

Emily Holbrook is the editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5915

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.