Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Ex-Guitarist Must KISS Royalties Goodbye to Satisfy Judgment

In an unpublished ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a district court did not err in holding that former KISS guitarist Vinnie “Vinnie Vincent” Cusano must surrender KISS royalty earnings to former bandmate Gene “Gene Simmons” Klein in order to cover Klein’s attorneys’ fees from a royalty dispute Cusano lost in 2003.  Cusano et al. v. Klein et al., Case No. 06-56871 (9th Cir., May 8, 2012) (Nelson, J.; Fisher, J;. Christen, J).

In 2003, Cusano sued his former KISS bandmates and record label alleging unpaid royalties owed for compositions he co-wrote with the band in the 1980s.  The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and awarded Klein a substantial attorneys’ fees award.  When Klein sought to recover such fees from Cusano’s royalty income stemming from the KISS compositions, Cusano argued in multiple appeals that his song royalties are protected from levy by federal and state law.

Consolidating Cusano’s various appeals, the 9th Circuit affirmed the district court’s attorneys’ fees award and held that Cusano’s royalty payments were not immune from collection to satisfy the 2003 judgment.  The court found unpersuasive Cusano’s assertion that song royalties are shielded by federal and state statutes that protect from garnishment 75 percent of an individual’s weekly “earnings”.  The court reasoned that the relevant statutes defined “earnings” as compensation for “personal services,” and Cusano offered no proof that continuing royalty payments are compensation for personal services.

The court also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Cusano’s various motions to invalidate the 2003 judgment.  Cusano’s 2006 motion for reconsideration and 2010 motion to vacate were untimely filed, as such motions must be made within one year after the entry of the judgment. 

Affirming the district court ruling, the 9th Circuit held that Klein may recover 100 percent of Cusano’s song royalty payments in order to satisfy the attorneys’ fees award in the 2003 judgment.

© 2013 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Associate

Elisabeth (Bess) Malis is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Los Angeles office.  Bess focuses her practice on trademark, copyright, right of publicity, promotion and advertising, as well as entertainment law matters.

310-788-1557

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.